Morris, Robert (NASA) | Bonet, Blai (Universidad Simón Bolívar) | Cavazza, Marc (Teesside University) | desJardins, Marie (University of Maryland, Baltimore County) | Felner, Ariel (BenGurion University) | Hawes, Nick (University of Birmingham) | Knox, Brad (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) | Koenig, Sven (University of Southern California) | Konidaris, George (Massachusetts Institute of Technology,) | Lang, Jérôme ((Université ParisDauphine) | López, Carlos Linares (Universidad Carlos III de Madrid) | Magazzeni, Daniele (King's College London) | McGovern, Amy (University of Oklahoma) | Natarajan, Sriraam (Indiana University) | Sturtevant, Nathan R. (University of Denver,) | Thielscher, Michael (University New South Wales) | Yeoh, William (New Mexico State University) | Sardina, Sebastian (RMIT University) | Wagstaff, Kiri (Jet Propulsion Laboratory)
The Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (AAAI-15) was held in January 2015 in Austin, Texas (USA) The conference program was cochaired by Sven Koenig and Blai Bonet. This report contains reflective summaries of the main conference, the robotics program, the AI and robotics workshop, the virtual agent exhibition, the what's hot track, the competition panel, the senior member track, student and outreach activities, the student abstract and poster program, the doctoral consortium, the women's mentoring event, and the demonstrations program.
We are pleased to introduce the space application issue articles in this issue of AI Magazine. The exploration of space is a testament to human curiosity and the desire to understand the universe that we inhabit. As many space agencies around the world design and deploy missions, it is apparent that there is a need for intelligent, exploring systems that can make decisions on their own in remote, potentially hostile environments. At the same time, the monetary cost of operating missions, combined with the growing complexity of the instruments and vehicles being deployed, make it apparent that substantial improvements can be made by the judicious use of automation in mission operations.
Ford, Kenneth M. (Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (IHMC)) | Allen, James (Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (IHMC)) | Suri, Niranjan (Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (IHMC)) | Hayes, Patrick J. (Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (IHMC)) | Morris, Robert (Nasa Ames Research Center)
Process integrated mechanisms (PIM) offer a new approach to the problem of coordinating the activity of physically distributed systems or devices. We propose a novel architecture to add to the mix, called the Process Integrated Mechanism (PIM), which enjoys the advantages of having a single controlling authority while avoiding the structural difficulties that have traditionally led to its rejection in many complex settings. The PIM models offers promise as an effective infrastructure for handling tasks that require a high degree of time-sensitive coordination between the components, as well as a clean mechanism for coordinating the high-level goals of loosely coupled systems. PIM models enable coordination without the fragility and high communication overhead of centralized control, but also without the uncertainty associated with the system-level behavior of a MAS.The PIM model provides an ease of programming with advantages over both multi-agent sys-tems and centralized architectures.