Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable success across various NLP benchmarks. However, excelling in complex tasks that require nuanced reasoning and precise decision-making demands more than raw language proficiency--LLMs must reason, i.e., think logically, draw from past experiences, and synthesize information to reach conclusions and take action. To enhance reasoning abilities, approaches such as prompting and fine-tuning have been widely explored. While these methods have led to clear improvements in reasoning, their impact on LLM safety remains less understood. In this work, we investigate the interplay between reasoning and safety in LLMs. We highlight the latent safety risks that arise as reasoning capabilities improve, shedding light on previously overlooked vulnerabilities. At the same time, we explore how reasoning itself can be leveraged to enhance safety, uncovering potential mitigation strategies. By examining both the risks and opportunities in reasoning-driven LLM safety, our study provides valuable insights for developing models that are not only more capable but also more trustworthy in real-world deployments.

Skip connection is an essential ingredient for modern deep models to be deeper and more powerful. Despite their huge success in normal scenarios (state-of-the-art classification performance on natural examples), we investigate and identify an interesting property of skip connections under adversarial scenarios, namely, the use of skip connections allows easier generation of highly transferable adversarial examples. Specifically, in ResNet-like models (with skip connections), we find that using more gradients from the skip connections rather than the residual modules according to a decay factor during backpropagation allows one to craft adversarial examples with high transferability. The above method is termed as Skip Gradient Method (SGM). Although starting from ResNet-like models in vision domains, we further extend SGM to more advanced architectures, including Vision Transformers (ViTs) and models with length-varying paths and other domains, i.e. natural language processing. We conduct comprehensive transfer attacks against various models including ResNets, Transformers, Inceptions, Neural Architecture Search, and Large Language Models (LLMs). We show that employing SGM can greatly improve the transferability of crafted attacks in almost all cases. Furthermore, considering the big complexity for practical use, we further demonstrate that SGM can even improve the transferability on ensembles of models or targeted attacks and the stealthiness against current defenses. At last, we provide theoretical explanations and empirical insights on how SGM works. Our findings not only motivate new adversarial research into the architectural characteristics of models but also open up further challenges for secure model architecture design. Our code is available at https://github.com/mo666666/SGM.

Although Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved tremendous success in various applications, they are also susceptible to certain prompts that can induce them to bypass built-in safety measures and provide dangerous or illegal content, a phenomenon known as jailbreak. To protect LLMs from producing harmful information, various defense strategies are proposed, with most focusing on content filtering or adversarial training of models. In this paper, we propose an approach named Prompt Adversarial Tuning (PAT) to train a defense control mechanism, which is then embedded as a prefix to user prompts to implement our defense strategy. We design a training process similar to adversarial training to achieve our optimized goal, alternating between updating attack and defense controls. To our knowledge, we are the first to implement defense from the perspective of prompt tuning. Once employed, our method will hardly impact the operational efficiency of LLMs. Experiments show that our method is effective in both black-box and white-box settings, reducing the success rate of advanced attacks to nearly 0 while maintaining the benign answer rate of 80% to simple benign questions. Our work might potentially chart a new perspective for future explorations in LLM security.