The AAAI-2000 Workshop Program was held Sunday and Monday, 3031 July 2000 at the Hyatt Regency Austin and the Austin Convention Center in Austin, Texas. The 15 workshops held were (1) Agent-Oriented Information Systems, (2) Artificial Intelligence and Music, (3) Artificial Intelligence and Web Search, (4) Constraints and AI Planning, (5) Integration of AI and OR: Techniques for Combinatorial Optimization, (6) Intelligent Lessons Learned Systems, (7) Knowledge-Based Electronic Markets, (8) Learning from Imbalanced Data Sets, (9) Learning Statistical Models from Rela-tional Data, (10) Leveraging Probability and Uncertainty in Computation, (11) Mobile Robotic Competition and Exhibition, (12) New Research Problems for Machine Learning, (13) Parallel and Distributed Search for Reasoning, (14) Representational Issues for Real-World Planning Systems, and (15) Spatial and Temporal Granularity.

The AAAI-2000 Workshop Program was held Sunday and Monday, 3031 July 2000 at the Hyatt Regency Austin and the Austin Convention Center in Austin, Texas. The 15 workshops held were (1) Agent-Oriented Information Systems, (2) Artificial Intelligence and Music, (3) Artificial Intelligence and Web Search, (4) Constraints and AI Planning, (5) Integration of AI and OR: Techniques for Combinatorial Optimization, (6) Intelligent Lessons Learned Systems, (7) Knowledge-Based Electronic Markets, (8) Learning from Imbalanced Data Sets, (9) Learning Statistical Models from Rela-tional Data, (10) Leveraging Probability and Uncertainty in Computation, (11) Mobile Robotic Competition and Exhibition, (12) New Research Problems for Machine Learning, (13) Parallel and Distributed Search for Reasoning, (14) Representational Issues for Real-World Planning Systems, and (15) Spatial and Temporal Granularity.

This article summarizes the Conference on Automated Learning and Discovery (CONALD), which took place in June 1998 at Carnegie Mellon University. CONALD brought together an interdisciplinary group of scientists concerned with decision making based on data. One of the meeting's focal points was the identification of promising research topics, which are discussed toward the end of this article.

At the same time, we are witnessing a healthy increase in research activities on issues related to automated learning and discovery. Although the broad topic of automated change. The progressing computerization of learning and discovery is inherently professional and private life, paired with a cross-disciplinary in nature--it falls right into sharp increase in memory, processing, and networking the intersection of disciplines such as statistics, capabilities of today's computers, computer science, cognitive psychology, robotics, makes it increasingly possible to gather and and its users such as medicine, social sciences, analyze vast amounts of data. For the first time, and public policy--these fields have people all around the world are connected to mostly studied this topic in isolation. Where is each other electronically through the internet, the field, and where is it going?

This paper presents two methods that can improve generalization on a broad class of problems. This class includes identifying low risk pneumonia patients. The first method, rankprop, tries to learn simple models that support ranking future cases while simultaneously learning to rank the training set. The second, multitask learning, uses lab tests available only during training, as additional target values to bias learning towards a more predictive hidden layer. Experiments using a database of pneumonia patients indicate that together these methods outperform standard backpropagation by 10-50%. Rankprop and MTL are applicable to a large class of problems in which the goal is to learn a relative ranking over the instance space, and where the training data includes features that will not be available at run time. Such problems include identifying higher-risk medical patients as early as possible, identifying lower-risk financial investments, and visual analysis of scenes that become easier to analyze as they are approached in the future. Acknowledgements We thank Greg Cooper, Michael Fine, and other members of the Pitt/CMU Cost-Effective Health Care group for help with the Medis Database. This work was supported by ARPA grant F33615-93-1-1330, NSF grant BES-9315428, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research grant HS06468, and an NSF Graduate Student Fellowship (Baluja).