In this paper we consider formulations of multi-class problems based on a generalized notion of a margin and using output coding. This includes, but is not restricted to, standard multi-class SVM formulations. Differently from many previous approaches we learn the code as well as the embedding function. We illustrate how this can lead to a formulation that allows for solving a wider range of problems with for instance many classes or even "missing classes". To keep our optimization problems tractable we propose an algorithm capable of solving them using twoclass classifiers, similar in spirit to Boosting.

In this paper we consider formulations of multi-class problems based on a generalized notion of a margin and using output coding. This includes, but is not restricted to, standard multi-class SVM formulations. Differently frommany previous approaches we learn the code as well as the embedding function. We illustrate how this can lead to a formulation that allows for solving a wider range of problems with for instance many classes or even "missing classes". To keep our optimization problems tractable we propose an algorithm capable of solving them using twoclass classifiers,similar in spirit to Boosting.

We give an unified convergence analysis of ensemble learning methods including e.g. AdaBoost, Logistic Regression and the Least-Square- Boost algorithm for regression. These methods have in common that they iteratively call a base learning algorithm which returns hypotheses that are then linearly combined. We show that these methods are related to the Gauss-Southwell method known from numerical optimization and state non-asymptotical convergence results for all these methods. Our analysis includes -norm regularized cost functions leading to a clean and general way to regularize ensemble learning.

We give an unified convergence analysis of ensemble learning methods includinge.g. AdaBoost, Logistic Regression and the Least-Square- Boost algorithm for regression. These methods have in common that they iteratively call a base learning algorithm which returns hypotheses that are then linearly combined. We show that these methods are related to the Gauss-Southwell method known from numerical optimization and state non-asymptotical convergence results for all these methods. Our analysis includes -norm regularized cost functions leading to a clean and general way to regularize ensemble learning.

We investigate a new kernel-based classifier: the Kernel Fisher Discriminant (KFD). A mathematical programming formulation based on the observation that KFD maximizes the average margin permits an interesting modification of the original KFD algorithm yielding the sparse KFD. We find that both, KFD and the proposed sparse KFD, can be understood in an unifying probabilistic context. Furthermore, we show connections to Support Vector Machines and Relevance Vector Machines. From this understanding, we are able to outline an interesting kernel-regression technique based upon the KFD algorithm.

We investigate a new kernel-based classifier: the Kernel Fisher Discriminant (KFD).A mathematical programming formulation based on the observation thatKFD maximizes the average margin permits an interesting modification of the original KFD algorithm yielding the sparse KFD. We find that both, KFD and the proposed sparse KFD, can be understood in an unifying probabilistic context. Furthermore, we show connections to Support Vector Machines and Relevance Vector Machines. From this understanding, we are able to outline an interesting kernel-regression technique based upon the KFD algorithm.

The idea of a large minimum margin [17] explains the good generalization performance of AdaBoost in the low noise regime. However, AdaBoost performs worse on noisy tasks [10, 11], such as the iris and the breast cancer benchmark data sets [1]. On the latter tasks, a large margin on all training points cannot be achieved without adverse effects on the generalization error. This experimental observation was supported by the study of [13] where the generalization error of ensemble methods was bounded by the sum of the fraction of training points which have a margin smaller than some value p, say, plus a complexity term depending on the base hypotheses and p. While this bound can only capture part of what is going on in practice, it nevertheless already conveys the message that in some cases it pays to allow for some points which have a small margin, or are misclassified, if this leads to a larger overall margin on the remaining points. To cope with this problem, it was mandatory to construct regularized variants of AdaBoost, which traded off the number of margin errors and the size of the margin 562 G. Riitsch, B. Sch6lkopf, A. J. Smola, K.-R.

In hyperspectral imagery one pixel typically consists of a mixture of the reflectance spectra of several materials, where the mixture coefficients correspond to the abundances of the constituting materials. We assume linear combinations of reflectance spectra with some additive normal sensor noise and derive a probabilistic MAP framework for analyzing hyperspectral data. As the material reflectance characteristics are not know a priori, we face the problem of unsupervised linear unmixing.

In hyperspectral imagery one pixel typically consists of a mixture of the reflectance spectra of several materials, where the mixture coefficients correspond to the abundances of the constituting materials. Weassume linear combinations of reflectance spectra with some additive normal sensor noise and derive a probabilistic MAP framework for analyzing hyperspectral data. As the material reflectance characteristicsare not know a priori, we face the problem of unsupervised linear unmixing.

The idea of a large minimum margin [17] explains the good generalization performance of AdaBoost in the low noise regime. However, AdaBoost performs worse on noisy tasks [10, 11], such as the iris and the breast cancer benchmark data sets [1]. On the latter tasks, a large margin on all training points cannot be achieved without adverse effects on the generalization error. This experimental observation was supported by the study of [13] where the generalization error of ensemble methods was bounded by the sum of the fraction of training points which have a margin smaller than some value p, say, plus a complexity term depending on the base hypotheses and p. While this bound can only capture part of what is going on in practice, it nevertheless already conveys the message that in some cases it pays to allow for some points which have a small margin, or are misclassified, if this leads to a larger overall margin on the remaining points. To cope with this problem, it was mandatory to construct regularized variants of AdaBoost, which traded off the number of margin errors and the size of the margin 562 G. Riitsch, B. Sch6lkopf, A. J. Smola, K.-R.