In this work we propose Hebbian-descent as a biologically plausible learning rule for hetero-associative as well as auto-associative learning in single layer artificial neural networks. It can be used as a replacement for gradient descent as well as Hebbian learning, in particular in online learning, as it inherits their advantages while not suffering from their disadvantages. We discuss the drawbacks of Hebbian learning as having problems with correlated input data and not profiting from seeing training patterns several times. For gradient descent we identify the derivative of the activation function as problematic especially in online learning. Hebbian-descent addresses these problems by getting rid of the activation function's derivative and by centering, i.e. keeping the neural activities mean free, leading to a biologically plausible update rule that is provably convergent, does not suffer from the vanishing error term problem, can deal with correlated data, profits from seeing patterns several times, and enables successful online learning when centering is used. We discuss its relationship to Hebbian learning, contrastive learning, and gradient decent and show that in case of a strictly positive derivative of the activation function Hebbian-descent leads to the same update rule as gradient descent but for a different loss function. In this case Hebbian-descent inherits the convergence properties of gradient descent, but we also show empirically that it converges when the derivative of the activation function is only non-negative, such as for the step function for example. Furthermore, in case of the mean squared error loss Hebbian-descent can be understood as the difference between two Hebb-learning steps, which in case of an invertible and integrable activation function actually optimizes a generalized linear model. ...

This work analyzes centered binary Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBMs) and binary Deep Boltzmann Machines (DBMs), where centering is done by subtracting offset values from visible and hidden variables. We show analytically that (i) centering results in a different but equivalent parameterization for artificial neural networks in general, (ii) the expected performance of centered binary RBMs/DBMs is invariant under simultaneous flip of data and offsets, for any offset value in the range of zero to one, (iii) centering can be reformulated as a different update rule for normal binary RBMs/DBMs, and (iv) using the enhanced gradient is equivalent to setting the offset values to the average over model and data mean. Furthermore, numerical simulations suggest that (i) optimal generative performance is achieved by subtracting mean values from visible as well as hidden variables, (ii) centered RBMs/DBMs reach significantly higher log-likelihood values than normal binary RBMs/DBMs, (iii) centering variants whose offsets depend on the model mean, like the enhanced gradient, suffer from severe divergence problems, (iv) learning is stabilized if an exponentially moving average over the batch means is used for the offset values instead of the current batch mean, which also prevents the enhanced gradient from diverging, (v) centered RBMs/DBMs reach higher LL values than normal RBMs/DBMs while having a smaller norm of the weight matrix, (vi) centering leads to an update direction that is closer to the natural gradient and that the natural gradient is extremly efficient for training RBMs, (vii) centering dispense the need for greedy layer-wise pre-training of DBMs, (viii) furthermore we show that pre-training often even worsen the results independently whether centering is used or not, and (ix) centering is also beneficial for auto encoders.

We present a theoretical analysis of Gaussian-binary restricted Boltzmann machines (GRBMs) from the perspective of density models. The key aspect of this analysis is to show that GRBMs can be formulated as a constrained mixture of Gaussians, which gives a much better insight into the model's capabilities and limitations. We show that GRBMs are capable of learning meaningful features both in a two-dimensional blind source separation task and in modeling natural images. Further, we show that reported difficulties in training GRBMs are due to the failure of the training algorithm rather than the model itself. Based on our analysis we are able to propose several training recipes, which allowed successful and fast training in our experiments. Finally, we discuss the relationship of GRBMs to several modifications that have been proposed to improve the model.