Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Martins, André


EuroBERT: Scaling Multilingual Encoders for European Languages

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Many important tasks in Natural Language Processing (NLP), including information retrieval, classification, or regression, are built upon general-purpose vector representations. These representations are traditionally obtained from bidirectional encoder models, which aggregate information from the left and right contexts of each token (Devlin et al., 2019; Conneau et al., 2020; He et al., 2023). In contrast, recent advances in generative modeling have shifted the research community's attention towards unidirectional architectures (Bai et al., 2023; Llama Team, 2024; OLMo et al., 2025). Notably, these efforts have identified several key performance drivers that span architectural advances, data improvements, and increased scale. Yet, despite no apparent barrier to transferring these insights to bidirectional architectures, little effort has been devoted towards this objective, forcing practitioners to depend on outdated models. In this paper, we introduce a refreshed recipe for training general-purpose multilingual encoders, resulting in the EuroBERT family. Drawing inspiration from recent progress in decoder models, our models feature an updated architecture ( 2.1), and are trained on a 5T-token multilingual dataset, covering widely spoken European and global languages,


Learning Non-Monotonic Automatic Post-Editing of Translations from Human Orderings

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Recent research in neural machine translation has explored flexible generation orders, as an alternative to left-to-right generation. However, training non-monotonic models brings a new complication: how to search for a good ordering when there is a combinatorial explosion of orderings arriving at the same final result? Also, how do these automatic orderings compare with the actual behaviour of human translators? Current models rely on manually built biases or are left to explore all possibilities on their own. In this paper, we analyze the orderings produced by human post-editors and use them to train an automatic post-editing system. We compare the resulting system with those trained with left-to-right and random post-editing orderings. We observe that humans tend to follow a nearly left-to-right order, but with interesting deviations, such as preferring to start by correcting punctuation or verbs.