Algorithms with predictions is a recent framework for decision-making under uncertainty that leverages the power of machine-learned predictions without making any assumption about their quality. The goal in this framework is for algorithms to achieve an improved performance when the predictions are accurate while maintaining acceptable guarantees when the predictions are erroneous. A serious concern with algorithms that use predictions is that these predictions can be biased and, as a result, cause the algorithm to make decisions that are deemed unfair. We show that this concern manifests itself in the classical secretary problem in the learning-augmented setting -- the state-of-the-art algorithm can have zero probability of accepting the best candidate, which we deem unfair, despite promising to accept a candidate whose expected value is at least $\max\{\Omega (1) , 1 - O(\epsilon)\}$ times the optimal value, where $\epsilon$ is the prediction error. We show how to preserve this promise while also guaranteeing to accept the best candidate with probability $\Omega(1)$. Our algorithm and analysis are based on a new "pegging" idea that diverges from existing works and simplifies/unifies some of their results. Finally, we extend to the $k$-secretary problem and complement our theoretical analysis with experiments.

Clustering is a cornerstone of contemporary machine learning and data analysis. A successful clustering algorithm partitions data elements so that similar items reside within the same group, while dissimilar items are separated. Introduced in 2004 by Bansal, Blum and Chawla Bansal et al. ((2004)), the correlation clustering objective offers a natural approach to model this problem. Due to its concise and elegant formulation, this problem has drawn significant interest from researchers and practitioners, leading to applications across diverse domains. These include ensemble clustering identification ((Bonchi et al., 2013)), duplicate detection ((Arasu et al., 2009)), community mining ((Chen et al., 2012)), disambiguation tasks ((Kalashnikov et al., 2008)), automated labeling ((Agrawal et al., 2009; Chakrabarti et al., 2008)), and many more. In the correlation clustering problem we are given a graph where each edge has either a positive or negative label, and where a positive edge (u, v) indicates that u, v are similar elements (and a negative edge (u, v) indicates that u, v are dissimilar), the objective is to compute a partition of the graph that minimizes the number of negative edges within clusters plus positive edges between clusters. Since the problem is NP-hard, researchers have focused on designing approximation algorithms. The algorithm proposed by Cao et al. ((2024)) achieves an approximation ratio of 1.43 + ϵ, improving upon the previous 1.73 + ϵ and 1.994 + ϵ achieved by Cohen-Addad et al. ((2023, 2022b)). Prior to these developments, the best approximation guarantee of 2.06 was attained by the algorithm of Chawla et al. ((2015)).