Purpose: To develop and validate a novel image reconstruction technique using implicit neural representations (INR) for multi-view thick-slice acquisitions while reducing the scan time but maintaining high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Methods: We propose Rotating-view super-resolution (ROVER)-MRI, an unsupervised neural network-based algorithm designed to reconstruct MRI data from multi-view thick slices, effectively reducing scan time by 2-fold while maintaining fine anatomical details. We compare our method to both bicubic interpolation and the current state-of-the-art regularized least-squares super-resolution reconstruction (LS-SRR) technique. Validation is performed using ground-truth ex-vivo monkey brain data, and we demonstrate superior reconstruction quality across several in-vivo human datasets. Notably, we achieve the reconstruction of a whole human brain in-vivo T2-weighted image with an unprecedented 180{\mu}m isotropic spatial resolution, accomplished in just 17 minutes of scan time on a 7T MRI scanner. Results: ROVER-MRI outperformed LS-SRR method in terms of reconstruction quality with 22.4% lower relative error (RE) and 7.5% lower full-width half maximum (FWHM) indicating better preservation of fine structural details in nearly half the scan time. Conclusion: ROVER-MRI offers an efficient and robust approach for mesoscale MR imaging, enabling rapid, high-resolution whole-brain scans. Its versatility holds great promise for research applications requiring anatomical details and time-efficient imaging.

The segmentation foundation model, e.g., Segment Anything Model (SAM), has attracted increasing interest in the medical image community. Early pioneering studies primarily concentrated on assessing and improving SAM's performance from the perspectives of overall accuracy and efficiency, yet little attention was given to the fairness considerations. This oversight raises questions about the potential for performance biases that could mirror those found in task-specific deep learning models like nnU-Net. In this paper, we explored the fairness dilemma concerning large segmentation foundation models. We prospectively curate a benchmark dataset of 3D MRI and CT scans of the organs including liver, kidney, spleen, lung and aorta from a total of 1056 healthy subjects with expert segmentations. Crucially, we document demographic details such as gender, age, and body mass index (BMI) for each subject to facilitate a nuanced fairness analysis. We test state-of-the-art foundation models for medical image segmentation, including the original SAM, medical SAM and SAT models, to evaluate segmentation efficacy across different demographic groups and identify disparities. Our comprehensive analysis, which accounts for various confounding factors, reveals significant fairness concerns within these foundational models. Moreover, our findings highlight not only disparities in overall segmentation metrics, such as the Dice Similarity Coefficient but also significant variations in the spatial distribution of segmentation errors, offering empirical evidence of the nuanced challenges in ensuring fairness in medical image segmentation.