Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have driven significant progress in zero-shot text-to-speech (TTS) synthesis. However, existing foundation models rely on multi-stage processing or complex architectures for predicting multiple codebooks, limiting efficiency and integration flexibility. To overcome these challenges, we introduce Spark-TTS, a novel system powered by BiCodec, a single-stream speech codec that decomposes speech into two complementary token types: low-bitrate semantic tokens for linguistic content and fixed-length global tokens for speaker attributes. This disentangled representation, combined with the Qwen2.5 LLM and a chain-of-thought (CoT) generation approach, enables both coarse-grained control (e.g., gender, speaking style) and fine-grained adjustments (e.g., precise pitch values, speaking rate). To facilitate research in controllable TTS, we introduce VoxBox, a meticulously curated 100,000-hour dataset with comprehensive attribute annotations. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Spark-TTS not only achieves state-of-the-art zero-shot voice cloning but also generates highly customizable voices that surpass the limitations of reference-based synthesis. Source code, pre-trained models, and audio samples are available at https://github.com/SparkAudio/Spark-TTS.

We present the latest iteration of the voice conversion challenge (VCC) series, a bi-annual scientific event aiming to compare and understand different voice conversion (VC) systems based on a common dataset. This year we shifted our focus to singing voice conversion (SVC), thus named the challenge the Singing Voice Conversion Challenge (SVCC). A new database was constructed for two tasks, namely in-domain and cross-domain SVC. The challenge was run for two months, and in total we received 26 submissions, including 2 baselines. Through a large-scale crowd-sourced listening test, we observed that for both tasks, although human-level naturalness was achieved by the top system, no team was able to obtain a similarity score as high as the target speakers. Also, as expected, cross-domain SVC is harder than in-domain SVC, especially in the similarity aspect. We also investigated whether existing objective measurements were able to predict perceptual performance, and found that only few of them could reach a significant correlation.