Domain generalization (DG) aims to learn models that can generalize well to unseen domains by training only on a set of source domains. Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) has been a popular approach for this, aiming to find flat minima in the total loss landscape. However, we show that minimizing the total loss sharpness does not guarantee sharpness across individual domains. In particular, SAM can converge to fake flat minima, where the total loss may exhibit flat minima, but sharp minima are present in individual domains. Moreover, the current perturbation update in gradient ascent steps is ineffective in directly updating the sharpness of individual domains. Motivated by these findings, we introduce a novel DG algorithm, Decreased-overhead Gradual Sharpness-Aware Minimization (DGSAM), that applies gradual domain-wise perturbation to reduce sharpness consistently across domains while maintaining computational efficiency. Our experiments demonstrate that DGSAM outperforms state-of-the-art DG methods, achieving improved robustness to domain shifts and better performance across various benchmarks, while reducing computational overhead compared to SAM.

Time series modeling and analysis has become critical in various domains. Conventional methods such as RNNs and Transformers, while effective for discrete-time and regularly sampled data, face significant challenges in capturing the continuous dynamics and irregular sampling patterns inherent in real-world scenarios. Neural Differential Equations (NDEs) represent a paradigm shift by combining the flexibility of neural networks with the mathematical rigor of differential equations. This paper presents a comprehensive review of NDE-based methods for time series analysis, including neural ordinary differential equations, neural controlled differential equations, and neural stochastic differential equations. We provide a detailed discussion of their mathematical formulations, numerical methods, and applications, highlighting their ability to model continuous-time dynamics. Furthermore, we address key challenges and future research directions. This survey serves as a foundation for researchers and practitioners seeking to leverage NDEs for advanced time series analysis.

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a prominent approach for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) by minimizing a combined loss function that incorporates both boundary loss and PDE residual loss. Despite their remarkable empirical performance in various scientific computing tasks, PINNs often fail to generate reasonable solutions, and such pathological behaviors remain difficult to explain and resolve. In this paper, we identify that PINNs can be adversely trained when gradients of each loss function exhibit a significant imbalance in their magnitudes and present a negative inner product value. To address these issues, we propose a novel optimization framework, Dual Cone Gradient Descent (DCGD), which adjusts the direction of the updated gradient to ensure it falls within a dual cone region. This region is defined as a set of vectors where the inner products with both the gradients of the PDE residual loss and the boundary loss are non-negative. Theoretically, we analyze the convergence properties of DCGD algorithms in a non-convex setting. On a variety of benchmark equations, we demonstrate that DCGD outperforms other optimization algorithms in terms of various evaluation metrics. In particular, DCGD achieves superior predictive accuracy and enhances the stability of training for failure modes of PINNs and complex PDEs, compared to existing optimally tuned models. Moreover, DCGD can be further improved by combining it with popular strategies for PINNs, including learning rate annealing and the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK).

We provide full theoretical guarantees for the convergence behaviour of diffusion-based generative models under the assumption of strongly logconcave data distributions while our approximating class of functions used for score estimation is made of Lipschitz continuous functions. We demonstrate via a motivating example, sampling from a Gaussian distribution with unknown mean, the powerfulness of our approach. In this case, explicit estimates are provided for the associated optimization problem, i.e. score approximation, while these are combined with the corresponding sampling estimates. As a result, we obtain the best known upper bound estimates in terms of key quantities of interest, such as the dimension and rates of convergence, for the Wasserstein-2 distance between the data distribution (Gaussian with unknown mean) and our sampling algorithm. Beyond the motivating example and in order to allow for the use of a diverse range of stochastic optimizers, we present our results using an $L^2$-accurate score estimation assumption, which crucially is formed under an expectation with respect to the stochastic optimizer and our novel auxiliary process that uses only known information. This approach yields the best known convergence rate for our sampling algorithm.

We introduce a new Langevin dynamics based algorithm, called e-TH$\varepsilon$O POULA, to solve optimization problems with discontinuous stochastic gradients which naturally appear in real-world applications such as quantile estimation, vector quantization, CVaR minimization, and regularized optimization problems involving ReLU neural networks. We demonstrate both theoretically and numerically the applicability of the e-TH$\varepsilon$O POULA algorithm. More precisely, under the conditions that the stochastic gradient is locally Lipschitz in average and satisfies a certain convexity at infinity condition, we establish non-asymptotic error bounds for e-TH$\varepsilon$O POULA in Wasserstein distances and provide a non-asymptotic estimate for the expected excess risk, which can be controlled to be arbitrarily small. Three key applications in finance and insurance are provided, namely, multi-period portfolio optimization, transfer learning in multi-period portfolio optimization, and insurance claim prediction, which involve neural networks with (Leaky)-ReLU activation functions. Numerical experiments conducted using real-world datasets illustrate the superior empirical performance of e-TH$\varepsilon$O POULA compared to SGLD, TUSLA, ADAM, and AMSGrad in terms of model accuracy.

We consider non-convex stochastic optimization problems where the objective functions have super-linearly growing and discontinuous stochastic gradients. In such a setting, we provide a non-asymptotic analysis for the tamed unadjusted stochastic Langevin algorithm (TUSLA) introduced in Lovas et al. (2021). In particular, we establish non-asymptotic error bounds for the TUSLA algorithm in Wasserstein-1 and Wasserstein-2 distances. The latter result enables us to further derive non-asymptotic estimates for the expected excess risk. To illustrate the applicability of the main results, we consider an example from transfer learning with ReLU neural networks, which represents a key paradigm in machine learning. Numerical experiments are presented for the aforementioned example which supports our theoretical findings. Hence, in this setting, we demonstrate both theoretically and numerically that the TUSLA algorithm can solve the optimization problem involving neural networks with ReLU activation function. Besides, we provide simulation results for synthetic examples where popular algorithms, e.g. ADAM, AMSGrad, RMSProp, and (vanilla) SGD, may fail to find the minimizer of the objective functions due to the super-linear growth and the discontinuity of the corresponding stochastic gradient, while the TUSLA algorithm converges rapidly to the optimal solution.

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are successfully trained when they are finely tuned via the optimization of their associated loss functions. Two aspects of such optimization tasks pose significant challenges, namely the non-convex nature of loss functions and the highly nonlinear features of many types of ANNs. Moreover, the analysis in Lovas et al. [2020] shows that the gradients of such non-convex loss functions typically grow faster than linearly and are only locally Lipschitz continuous. Naturally, stability issues are observed, which are known as the'exploding gradient' phenomenon (Bengio et al. [1994] and Pascanu et al. [2013]), when vanilla stochastic gradient descent (SGDs) or certain types of adaptive algorithms are used for fine tuning. Section 2 provides a simple but transparent example as to why this phenomenon is observed, even when some of the most popular adaptive algorithms are employed. One further notes that occurrences of vanishing gradients are often reported in the ANNs literature (Zhang et al. [2018] and Pascanu et al. [2013]). This phenomenon seems to particularly affect the performance of TUSLA (Lovas et al. [2020]) in our experiments when comparison is made with other popular algorithms such as AdaGrad (Duchi et al. [2011]), RMSProp (Tieleman and Hinton [2012]), ADAM (Kingma and Ba [2015]) and AMSGrad (Reddi et al. [2018]). This is observed despite TUSLA's stability properties which successfully control any potential'exploding gradient' occurrences.