Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Li, Honghao


FedECA: A Federated External Control Arm Method for Causal Inference with Time-To-Event Data in Distributed Settings

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

External control arms (ECA) can inform the early clinical development of experimental drugs and provide efficacy evidence for regulatory approval in non-randomized settings. However, the main challenge of implementing ECA lies in accessing real-world data or historical clinical trials. Indeed, data sharing is often not feasible due to privacy considerations related to data leaving the original collection centers, along with pharmaceutical companies' competitive motives. In this paper, we leverage a privacy-enhancing technology called federated learning (FL) to remove some of the barriers to data sharing. We introduce a federated learning inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) method for time-to-event outcomes called FedECA which eases the implementation of ECA by limiting patients' data exposure. We show with extensive experiments that FedECA outperforms its closest competitor, matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC), in terms of statistical power and ability to balance the treatment and control groups. To encourage the use of such methods, we publicly release our code which relies on Substra, an open-source FL software with proven experience in privacy-sensitive contexts.


Learning interpretable causal networks from very large datasets, application to 400,000 medical records of breast cancer patients

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Discovering causal effects is at the core of scientific investigation but remains challenging when only observational data is available. In practice, causal networks are difficult to learn and interpret, and limited to relatively small datasets. We report a more reliable and scalable causal discovery method (iMIIC), based on a general mutual information supremum principle, which greatly improves the precision of inferred causal relations while distinguishing genuine causes from putative and latent causal effects. We showcase iMIIC on synthetic and real-life healthcare data from 396,179 breast cancer patients from the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. More than 90\% of predicted causal effects appear correct, while the remaining unexpected direct and indirect causal effects can be interpreted in terms of diagnostic procedures, therapeutic timing, patient preference or socio-economic disparity. iMIIC's unique capabilities open up new avenues to discover reliable and interpretable causal networks across a range of research fields.