A number of studies suggest bias of the face biometrics, i.e., face recognition and soft-biometric estimation methods, across gender, race, and age groups. There is a recent urge to investigate the bias of different biometric modalities toward the deployment of fair and trustworthy biometric solutions. Ocular biometrics has obtained increased attention from academia and industry due to its high accuracy, security, privacy, and ease of use in mobile devices. A recent study in $2020$ also suggested the fairness of ocular-based user recognition across males and females. This paper aims to evaluate the fairness of ocular biometrics in the visible spectrum among age groups; young, middle, and older adults. Thanks to the availability of the latest large-scale 2020 UFPR ocular biometric dataset, with subjects acquired in the age range 18 - 79 years, to facilitate this study. Experimental results suggest the overall equivalent performance of ocular biometrics across gender and age groups in user verification and gender classification. Performance difference for older adults at lower false match rate and young adults was noted at user verification and age classification, respectively. This could be attributed to inherent characteristics of the biometric data from these age groups impacting specific applications, which suggest a need for advancement in sensor technology and software solutions.

Automated gender classification has important applications in many domains, such as demographic research, law enforcement, online advertising, as well as human-computer interaction. Recent research has questioned the fairness of this technology across gender and race. Specifically, the majority of the studies raised the concern of higher error rates of the face-based gender classification system for darker-skinned people like African-American and for women. However, to date, the majority of existing studies were limited to African-American and Caucasian only. The aim of this paper is to investigate the differential performance of the gender classification algorithms across gender-race groups. To this aim, we investigate the impact of (a) architectural differences in the deep learning algorithms and (b) training set imbalance, as a potential source of bias causing differential performance across gender and race. Experimental investigations are conducted on two latest large-scale publicly available facial attribute datasets, namely, UTKFace and FairFace. The experimental results suggested that the algorithms with architectural differences varied in performance with consistency towards specific gender-race groups. For instance, for all the algorithms used, Black females (Black race in general) always obtained the least accuracy rates. Middle Eastern males and Latino females obtained higher accuracy rates most of the time. Training set imbalance further widens the gap in the unequal accuracy rates across all gender-race groups. Further investigations using facial landmarks suggested that facial morphological differences due to the bone structure influenced by genetic and environmental factors could be the cause of the least performance of Black females and Black race, in general.