Humans seem to have a bias to overshoot when rotating a rotary knob blindfolded around a specified target angle (i.e. during haptic rotation). Whereas some influence factors that strengthen or weaken such an effect are already known, the underlying reasons for the overshoot are still unknown. This work approaches the topic of haptic rotations by analyzing a detailed recording of the movement. We propose an experimental framework and an approach to investigate which upper limb and hand joint movements contribute significantly to a haptic rotation task and to the angle overshoot based on the acquired data. With stepwise regression with backward elimination, we analyze a rotation around 90 degrees counterclockwise with two fingers under different grasping orientations. Our results showed that the wrist joint, the sideways finger movement in the proximal joints, and the distal finger joints contributed significantly to overshooting. This suggests that two phenomena are behind the overshooting: 1) The significant contribution of the wrist joint indicates a bias of a hand-centered egocentric reference frame. 2) Significant contribution of the finger joints indicates a rolling of the fingertips over the rotary knob surface and, thus, a change of contact point for which probably the human does not compensate.

Most commercially available haptic gloves compromise the accuracy of hand-posture measurements in favor of a simpler design with fewer sensors. While inaccurate posture data is often sufficient for the task at hand in biomedical settings such as VR-therapy-aided rehabilitation, measurements should be as precise as possible to digitally recreate hand postures as accurately as possible. With these applications in mind, we have added extra sensors to the commercially available Dexmo haptic glove by Dexta Robotics and applied kinematic models of the haptic glove and the user's hand to improve the accuracy of hand-posture measurements. In this work, we describe the augmentations and the kinematic modeling approach. Additionally, we present and discuss an evaluation of hand posture measurements as a proof of concept.

Prior to the deep learning era, shape was commonly used to describe the objects. Nowadays, state-of-the-art (SOTA) algorithms in medical imaging are predominantly diverging from computer vision, where voxel grids, meshes, point clouds, and implicit surface models are used. This is seen from numerous shape-related publications in premier vision conferences as well as the growing popularity of ShapeNet (about 51,300 models) and Princeton ModelNet (127,915 models). For the medical domain, we present a large collection of anatomical shapes (e.g., bones, organs, vessels) and 3D models of surgical instrument, called MedShapeNet, created to facilitate the translation of data-driven vision algorithms to medical applications and to adapt SOTA vision algorithms to medical problems. As a unique feature, we directly model the majority of shapes on the imaging data of real patients. As of today, MedShapeNet includes 23 dataset with more than 100,000 shapes that are paired with annotations (ground truth). Our data is freely accessible via a web interface and a Python application programming interface (API) and can be used for discriminative, reconstructive, and variational benchmarks as well as various applications in virtual, augmented, or mixed reality, and 3D printing. Exemplary, we present use cases in the fields of classification of brain tumors, facial and skull reconstructions, multi-class anatomy completion, education, and 3D printing. In future, we will extend the data and improve the interfaces. The project pages are: https://medshapenet.ikim.nrw/ and https://github.com/Jianningli/medshapenet-feedback