Kloumann, Isabel
Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models
Touvron, Hugo, Martin, Louis, Stone, Kevin, Albert, Peter, Almahairi, Amjad, Babaei, Yasmine, Bashlykov, Nikolay, Batra, Soumya, Bhargava, Prajjwal, Bhosale, Shruti, Bikel, Dan, Blecher, Lukas, Ferrer, Cristian Canton, Chen, Moya, Cucurull, Guillem, Esiobu, David, Fernandes, Jude, Fu, Jeremy, Fu, Wenyin, Fuller, Brian, Gao, Cynthia, Goswami, Vedanuj, Goyal, Naman, Hartshorn, Anthony, Hosseini, Saghar, Hou, Rui, Inan, Hakan, Kardas, Marcin, Kerkez, Viktor, Khabsa, Madian, Kloumann, Isabel, Korenev, Artem, Koura, Punit Singh, Lachaux, Marie-Anne, Lavril, Thibaut, Lee, Jenya, Liskovich, Diana, Lu, Yinghai, Mao, Yuning, Martinet, Xavier, Mihaylov, Todor, Mishra, Pushkar, Molybog, Igor, Nie, Yixin, Poulton, Andrew, Reizenstein, Jeremy, Rungta, Rashi, Saladi, Kalyan, Schelten, Alan, Silva, Ruan, Smith, Eric Michael, Subramanian, Ranjan, Tan, Xiaoqing Ellen, Tang, Binh, Taylor, Ross, Williams, Adina, Kuan, Jian Xiang, Xu, Puxin, Yan, Zheng, Zarov, Iliyan, Zhang, Yuchen, Fan, Angela, Kambadur, Melanie, Narang, Sharan, Rodriguez, Aurelien, Stojnic, Robert, Edunov, Sergey, Scialom, Thomas
In this work, we develop and release Llama 2, a collection of pretrained and fine-tuned large language models (LLMs) ranging in scale from 7 billion to 70 billion parameters. Our fine-tuned LLMs, called Llama 2-Chat, are optimized for dialogue use cases. Our models outperform open-source chat models on most benchmarks we tested, and based on our human evaluations for helpfulness and safety, may be a suitable substitute for closed-source models. We provide a detailed description of our approach to fine-tuning and safety improvements of Llama 2-Chat in order to enable the community to build on our work and contribute to the responsible development of LLMs.
An optimizable scalar objective value cannot be objective and should not be the sole objective
Kloumann, Isabel, Tygert, Mark
The morality of algorithms and their potential for bias and discrimination are important concerns. A popular approach to machine learning and artificial intelligence is via the numerical optimization of objective functions, and adapting such an approach to handle ethics could seem natural: with a hammer in hand, everything looks like a nail. The hammer of much artificial intelligence is the optimization of objective values, so some might like to treat morality solely through such objective functions. However, relying solely on the optimization of scalar objective values is fraught with unavoidable flaws when dealing with real people.