This paper presents ICAT, an evaluation framework for measuring coverage of diverse factual information in long-form text generation. ICAT breaks down a long output text into a list of atomic claims and not only verifies each claim through retrieval from a (reliable) knowledge source, but also computes the alignment between the atomic factual claims and various aspects expected to be presented in the output. We study three implementations of the ICAT framework, each with a different assumption on the availability of aspects and alignment method. By adopting data from the diversification task in the TREC Web Track and the ClueWeb corpus, we evaluate the ICAT framework. We demonstrate strong correlation with human judgments and provide comprehensive evaluation across multiple state-of-the-art LLMs. Our framework further offers interpretable and fine-grained analysis of diversity and coverage. Its modular design allows for easy adaptation to different domains and datasets, making it a valuable tool for evaluating the qualitative aspects of long-form responses produced by LLMs.

ICD coding is the international standard for capturing and reporting health conditions and diagnosis for revenue cycle management in healthcare. Manually assigning ICD codes is prone to human error due to the large code vocabulary and the similarities between codes. Since machine learning based approaches require ground truth training data, the inconsistency among human coders is manifested as noise in labeling, which makes the training and evaluation of ICD classifiers difficult in presence of such noise. This paper investigates the characteristics of such noise in manually-assigned ICD-10 codes and furthermore, proposes a method to train robust ICD-10 classifiers in the presence of labeling noise. Our research concluded that the nature of such noise is systematic. Most of the existing methods for handling label noise assume that the noise is completely random and independent of features or labels, which is not the case for ICD data. Therefore, we develop a new method for training robust classifiers in the presence of systematic noise. We first identify ICD-10 codes that human coders tend to misuse or confuse, based on the codes' locations in the ICD-10 hierarchy, the types of the codes, and baseline classifier's prediction behaviors; we then develop a novel training strategy that accounts for such noise. We compared our method with the baseline that does not handle label noise and the baseline methods that assume random noise, and demonstrated that our proposed method outperforms all baselines when evaluated on expert validated labels.