Jonske, Frederic
MedShapeNet -- A Large-Scale Dataset of 3D Medical Shapes for Computer Vision
Li, Jianning, Zhou, Zongwei, Yang, Jiancheng, Pepe, Antonio, Gsaxner, Christina, Luijten, Gijs, Qu, Chongyu, Zhang, Tiezheng, Chen, Xiaoxi, Li, Wenxuan, Wodzinski, Marek, Friedrich, Paul, Xie, Kangxian, Jin, Yuan, Ambigapathy, Narmada, Nasca, Enrico, Solak, Naida, Melito, Gian Marco, Vu, Viet Duc, Memon, Afaque R., Schlachta, Christopher, De Ribaupierre, Sandrine, Patel, Rajnikant, Eagleson, Roy, Chen, Xiaojun, Mächler, Heinrich, Kirschke, Jan Stefan, de la Rosa, Ezequiel, Christ, Patrick Ferdinand, Li, Hongwei Bran, Ellis, David G., Aizenberg, Michele R., Gatidis, Sergios, Küstner, Thomas, Shusharina, Nadya, Heller, Nicholas, Andrearczyk, Vincent, Depeursinge, Adrien, Hatt, Mathieu, Sekuboyina, Anjany, Löffler, Maximilian, Liebl, Hans, Dorent, Reuben, Vercauteren, Tom, Shapey, Jonathan, Kujawa, Aaron, Cornelissen, Stefan, Langenhuizen, Patrick, Ben-Hamadou, Achraf, Rekik, Ahmed, Pujades, Sergi, Boyer, Edmond, Bolelli, Federico, Grana, Costantino, Lumetti, Luca, Salehi, Hamidreza, Ma, Jun, Zhang, Yao, Gharleghi, Ramtin, Beier, Susann, Sowmya, Arcot, Garza-Villarreal, Eduardo A., Balducci, Thania, Angeles-Valdez, Diego, Souza, Roberto, Rittner, Leticia, Frayne, Richard, Ji, Yuanfeng, Ferrari, Vincenzo, Chatterjee, Soumick, Dubost, Florian, Schreiber, Stefanie, Mattern, Hendrik, Speck, Oliver, Haehn, Daniel, John, Christoph, Nürnberger, Andreas, Pedrosa, João, Ferreira, Carlos, Aresta, Guilherme, Cunha, António, Campilho, Aurélio, Suter, Yannick, Garcia, Jose, Lalande, Alain, Vandenbossche, Vicky, Van Oevelen, Aline, Duquesne, Kate, Mekhzoum, Hamza, Vandemeulebroucke, Jef, Audenaert, Emmanuel, Krebs, Claudia, van Leeuwen, Timo, Vereecke, Evie, Heidemeyer, Hauke, Röhrig, Rainer, Hölzle, Frank, Badeli, Vahid, Krieger, Kathrin, Gunzer, Matthias, Chen, Jianxu, van Meegdenburg, Timo, Dada, Amin, Balzer, Miriam, Fragemann, Jana, Jonske, Frederic, Rempe, Moritz, Malorodov, Stanislav, Bahnsen, Fin H., Seibold, Constantin, Jaus, Alexander, Marinov, Zdravko, Jaeger, Paul F., Stiefelhagen, Rainer, Santos, Ana Sofia, Lindo, Mariana, Ferreira, André, Alves, Victor, Kamp, Michael, Abourayya, Amr, Nensa, Felix, Hörst, Fabian, Brehmer, Alexander, Heine, Lukas, Hanusrichter, Yannik, Weßling, Martin, Dudda, Marcel, Podleska, Lars E., Fink, Matthias A., Keyl, Julius, Tserpes, Konstantinos, Kim, Moon-Sung, Elhabian, Shireen, Lamecker, Hans, Zukić, Dženan, Paniagua, Beatriz, Wachinger, Christian, Urschler, Martin, Duong, Luc, Wasserthal, Jakob, Hoyer, Peter F., Basu, Oliver, Maal, Thomas, Witjes, Max J. H., Schiele, Gregor, Chang, Ti-chiun, Ahmadi, Seyed-Ahmad, Luo, Ping, Menze, Bjoern, Reyes, Mauricio, Deserno, Thomas M., Davatzikos, Christos, Puladi, Behrus, Fua, Pascal, Yuille, Alan L., Kleesiek, Jens, Egger, Jan
Prior to the deep learning era, shape was commonly used to describe the objects. Nowadays, state-of-the-art (SOTA) algorithms in medical imaging are predominantly diverging from computer vision, where voxel grids, meshes, point clouds, and implicit surface models are used. This is seen from numerous shape-related publications in premier vision conferences as well as the growing popularity of ShapeNet (about 51,300 models) and Princeton ModelNet (127,915 models). For the medical domain, we present a large collection of anatomical shapes (e.g., bones, organs, vessels) and 3D models of surgical instrument, called MedShapeNet, created to facilitate the translation of data-driven vision algorithms to medical applications and to adapt SOTA vision algorithms to medical problems. As a unique feature, we directly model the majority of shapes on the imaging data of real patients. As of today, MedShapeNet includes 23 dataset with more than 100,000 shapes that are paired with annotations (ground truth). Our data is freely accessible via a web interface and a Python application programming interface (API) and can be used for discriminative, reconstructive, and variational benchmarks as well as various applications in virtual, augmented, or mixed reality, and 3D printing. Exemplary, we present use cases in the fields of classification of brain tumors, facial and skull reconstructions, multi-class anatomy completion, education, and 3D printing. In future, we will extend the data and improve the interfaces. The project pages are: https://medshapenet.ikim.nrw/ and https://github.com/Jianningli/medshapenet-feedback
MOMO -- Deep Learning-driven classification of external DICOM studies for PACS archivation
Jonske, Frederic, Dederichs, Maximilian, Kim, Moon-Sung, Egger, Jan, Umutlu, Lale, Forsting, Michael, Nensa, Felix, Kleesiek, Jens
Patients regularly continue assessment or treatment in other facilities than they began them in, receiving their previous imaging studies as a CD-ROM and requiring clinical staff at the new hospital to import these studies into their local database. However, between different facilities, standards for nomenclature, contents, or even medical procedures may vary, often requiring human intervention to accurately classify the received studies in the context of the recipient hospital's standards. In this study, the authors present MOMO (MOdality Mapping and Orchestration), a deep learning-based approach to automate this mapping process utilizing metadata substring matching and a neural network ensemble, which is trained to recognize the 76 most common imaging studies across seven different modalities. A retrospective study is performed to measure the accuracy that this algorithm can provide. To this end, a set of 11,934 imaging series with existing labels was retrieved from the local hospital's PACS database to train the neural networks. A set of 843 completely anonymized external studies was hand-labeled to assess the performance of our algorithm. Additionally, an ablation study was performed to measure the performance impact of the network ensemble in the algorithm, and a comparative performance test with a commercial product was conducted. In comparison to a commercial product (96.20% predictive power, 82.86% accuracy, 1.36% minor errors), a neural network ensemble alone performs the classification task with less accuracy (99.05% predictive power, 72.69% accuracy, 10.3% minor errors). However, MOMO outperforms either by a large margin in accuracy and with increased predictive power (99.29% predictive power, 92.71% accuracy, 2.63% minor errors).