Human and AI are increasingly interacting and collaborating to accomplish various complex tasks in the context of diverse application domains (e.g., healthcare, transportation, and creative design). Two dynamic, learning entities (AI and human) have distinct mental model, expertise, and ability; such fundamental difference/mismatch offers opportunities for bringing new perspectives to achieve better results. However, this mismatch can cause unexpected failure and result in serious consequences. While recent research has paid much attention to enhancing interpretability or explainability to allow machine to explain how it makes a decision for supporting humans, this research argues that there is urging the need for both human and AI should develop specific, corresponding ability to interact and collaborate with each other to form a human-AI team to accomplish superior results. This research introduces a conceptual framework called "Co-Learning," in which people can learn with/from and grow with AI partners over time. We characterize three key concepts of co-learning: "mutual understanding," "mutual benefits," and "mutual growth" for facilitating human-AI collaboration on complex problem solving. We will present proof-of-concepts to investigate whether and how our approach can help human-AI team to understand and benefit each other, and ultimately improve productivity and creativity on creative problem domains. The insights will contribute to the design of Human-AI collaboration.

Writing is challenging, especially for non-native speakers. To support English as a Second Language (ESL) writing, we propose StructFeed, which allows native speakers to annotate topic sentence and relevant keywords in texts and generate writing hints based on the principle of paragraph unity. First, we compared our crowd-based method with three naive machine learning (ML) methods and got the best performance on the identification of topic sentence and irrelevant sentence in the article. Next, we evaluated the StructFeed system with two feedback-generation mechanisms including feedback generated by one expert and by one crowd worker. The results showed that people who received feedback by StructFeed got the highest improvement after revision.

Relation extraction, which learns semantic relations of concept pairs from text, is an approach for mining commonsense knowledge. This paper investigates an approach for relation extraction, which helps expand a commonsense knowledge base with little labor work. We proposed a framework that learns new pairs from Chinese corpora by adopting concept pairs in Chinese commonsense knowledge base as seeds. Multiple instance learning is utilized as the learning algorithm for predicting relation for unseen pairs. The performance of our system could be improved by learning multiple iterations. The results in each iteration are manually evaluated and processed to next iteration as seeds. Our experiments extracted new pairs for relations “AtLocation”, “CapableOf”, and “HasProperty”. This study showed that new pairs could be extracted from text without huge humans work.

Robust intelligent systems may leverage knowledge about the world to cope with a variety of contexts.While automatic knowledge extraction algorithms have been successfully used to build knowledge bases in English,little progress has been made in extracting non-alphabetic languages, e.g. Chinese.This paper identifies the key challenge in instance and pattern extraction for Chinese and presents the Coupled Chinese Pattern Learner that utilizes part-of-speech tagging and language-dependent grammar rules for generalized matching in the Chinese never-ending language learner framework for large-scale knowledge extraction from online documents.Experiments showed that the proposed system is scalable and achieves a precision of 79.9% in learning categories after a small number of iterations.

Learning a second language is becoming a more popular trend around the world. But the act of learning another language in a place removed from native speakers is difficult as there is often no one to correct mistakes nor examples to imitate. With the idea of crowd sourcing, we would like to propose an efficient way to learn a second language better.

Humorous images can be seen in many social media websites. However, newcomers to these websites often have trouble fitting in because the community subculture is usually implicit. Among all the types of humorous images, Internet memes are relatively hard for newcomers to understand. In this work, we develop a system that leverages crowdsourcing techniques to generate explanations for memes. We claim that people who are not familiar with Internet meme subculture can still quickly pick up the gist of the memes by reading the explanations. Our template-based explanations illustrate the incongruity between normal situations and the punchlines in jokes. The explanations can be produced by completing the two proposed human task processes. Experimental results suggest that the explanations produced by our system greatly help newcomers to understand unfamiliar memes. For further research, it is possible to employ our explanation generation system to improve computational humanities.

A Chinese character embedded in different compound words may carry different meanings. In this paper, we aim at semantical clustering of a given family of morphologically related Chinese words. In Experiment 1, we employed linguistic features at the word, syntactic, semantic, and contextual levels in aggregated computational linguistics methods to handle the clustering task. In Experiment 2, we recruited adults and children to perform the clustering task. Experimental results indicate that our computational model achieved a similar level of performance as children.

Humorous images can be seen in many social media websites. However, newcomers to these websites often have trouble fitting in because of the subculture among the community is usually implicit. Among all the types of humorous images, Internet memes are relatively hard for newcomers to understand. In this work, we develop a system leveraging crowdsourcing technique to generate explanations for meme images. We claim that people who are not familiar with Internet meme subculture can still quickly pick up the gist of the memes through reading the explanations. Our template-based explanation can illustrate the incongruity between normal situations and the punchlines in jokes. The explanations can be produced by going through 2 designed humor tasks. In our pilot study, acceptable explanations for 5 unique memes are generated. For further study, generating explanations for more general text jokes are possible.

Recognizing social interests plays an important role of aiding human-computer interaction and human collaborative works. The recognition of social interest could be of great help to determine the smoothness of the interaction, which could be an indicator for group work performance and relationship. From socio-psychological theories, social engagement is the observable form of inner social interest, and represented as patterns of turn-taking and speech emotion during a face-to-face conversation. With these two kinds of features, a multi-layer learning structure is proposed to model the continuous trend of engagement. The level of engagement is classified into “high” and “low” two levels according to human-annotated score. In the result of assessing two-level engagemet, the highest accuracy of our model can reach 79.1%.

Contextual knowledge is essential in answering questions given specific observations. While recent approaches to building commonsense knowledge basesvia text mining and/or crowdsourcing are successful,contextual knowledge is largely missing. To addressthis gap, this paper presents SocialExplain, a novel approach to acquiring contextual commonsense knowledge from explanations of social content. The acquisition process is broken into two cognitively simple tasks:to identify contextual clues from the given social content, and to explain the content with the clues. An experiment was conducted to show that multiple piecesof contextual commonsense knowledge can be identi-fied from a small number of tweets. Online users verified that 92.45% of the acquired sentences are good,and 95.92% are new sentences compared with existingcrowd-sourced commonsense knowledge bases.