Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a promising solution for collaborative training of large language models (LLMs). However, the integration of LLMs into FL introduces new challenges, particularly concerning the evaluation of LLMs. Traditional evaluation methods that rely on labeled test sets and similarity-based metrics cover only a subset of the acceptable answers, thereby failing to accurately reflect the performance of LLMs on generative tasks. Meanwhile, although automatic evaluation methods that leverage advanced LLMs present potential, they face critical risks of data leakage due to the need to transmit data to external servers and suboptimal performance on downstream tasks due to the lack of domain knowledge. To address these issues, we propose a Federated Evaluation framework of Large Language Models, named FedEval-LLM, that provides reliable performance measurements of LLMs on downstream tasks without the reliance on labeled test sets and external tools, thus ensuring strong privacy-preserving capability. FedEval-LLM leverages a consortium of personalized LLMs from participants as referees to provide domain knowledge and collective evaluation capability, thus aligning to the respective downstream tasks and mitigating uncertainties and biases associated with a single referee. Experimental results demonstrate a significant improvement in the evaluation capability of personalized evaluation models on downstream tasks. When applied to FL, these evaluation models exhibit strong agreement with human preference and RougeL-score on meticulously curated test sets. FedEval-LLM effectively overcomes the limitations of traditional metrics and the reliance on external services, making it a promising framework for the evaluation of LLMs within collaborative training scenarios.

The springing up of Large Language Models (LLMs) has shifted the community from single-task-orientated natural language processing (NLP) research to a holistic end-to-end multi-task learning paradigm. Along this line of research endeavors in the area, LLM-based prompting methods have attracted much attention, partially due to the technological advantages brought by prompt engineering (PE) as well as the underlying NLP principles disclosed by various prompting methods. Traditional supervised learning usually requires training a model based on labeled data and then making predictions. In contrast, PE methods directly use the powerful capabilities of existing LLMs (i.e., GPT-3 and GPT-4) via composing appropriate prompts, especially under few-shot or zero-shot scenarios. Facing the abundance of studies related to the prompting and the ever-evolving nature of this field, this article aims to (i) illustrate a novel perspective to review existing PE methods, within the well-established communication theory framework; (ii) facilitate a better/deeper understanding of developing trends of existing PE methods used in four typical tasks; (iii) shed light on promising research directions for future PE methods.

Federated Learning (FL) [1] is a novel machine learning paradigm where multiple parties collaboratively build machine learning models without centralizing their data. The concept of FL was first proposed by Google in 2016 [2] to describe a cross-device scenario where millions of mobile devices are coordinated by a central server while local data are not transferred. This concept is soon extended to a cross-silo collaboration scenario among organizations [3], where a small number of reliable organizations join a federation to train a machine learning model. In [3], FL is, for the first time, categorized into three categories based on how data is partitioned in the sample and feature space: Horizontal Federated Learning (HFL), Vertical Federated Learning (VFL) and Federated Transfer Learning (FTL) (See Figure 1). HFL refers to the FL setting where participants share the same feature space while holding different samples. For example, Google uses HFL to allow mobile phone users to use their dataset to collaboratively train a next-word prediction model [2]. VFL refers to the FL setting where datasets share the same samples/users while holding different features. For example, Webank uses VFL to collaborate with an invoice agency to build financial risk models for their enterprise customers [4].

Vertical federated learning (VFL), a variant of Federated Learning (FL), has recently drawn increasing attention as the VFL matches the enterprises' demands of leveraging more valuable features to achieve better model performance. However, conventional VFL methods may run into data deficiency as they exploit only aligned and labeled samples (belonging to different parties), leaving often the majority of unaligned and unlabeled samples unused. The data deficiency hampers the effort of the federation. In this work, we propose a Federated Hybrid Self-Supervised Learning framework, named FedHSSL, that utilizes cross-party views (i.e., dispersed features) of samples aligned among parties and local views (i.e., augmentation) of unaligned samples within each party to improve the representation learning capability of the VFL joint model. FedHSSL further exploits invariant features across parties to boost the performance of the joint model through partial model aggregation. FedHSSL, as a framework, can work with various representative SSL methods. We empirically demonstrate that FedHSSL methods outperform baselines by large margins. We provide an in-depth analysis of FedHSSL regarding label leakage, which is rarely investigated in existing self-supervised VFL works. The experimental results show that, with proper protection, FedHSSL achieves the best privacy-utility trade-off against the state-of-the-art label inference attack compared with baselines. Code is available at \url{https://github.com/jorghyq2016/FedHSSL}.

Conventionally, federated learning aims to optimize a single objective, typically the utility. However, for a federated learning system to be trustworthy, it needs to simultaneously satisfy multiple/many objectives, such as maximizing model performance, minimizing privacy leakage and training cost, and being robust to malicious attacks. Multi-Objective Optimization (MOO) aiming to optimize multiple conflicting objectives at the same time is quite suitable for solving the optimization problem of Trustworthy Federated Learning (TFL). In this paper, we unify MOO and TFL by formulating the problem of constrained multi-objective federated learning (CMOFL). Under this formulation, existing MOO algorithms can be adapted to TFL straightforwardly. Different from existing CMOFL works focusing on utility, efficiency, fairness, and robustness, we consider optimizing privacy leakage along with utility loss and training cost, the three primary objectives of a TFL system. We develop two improved CMOFL algorithms based on NSGA-II and PSL, respectively, for effectively and efficiently finding Pareto optimal solutions, and we provide theoretical analysis on their convergence. We design specific measurements of privacy leakage, utility loss, and training cost for three privacy protection mechanisms: Randomization, BatchCrypt (An efficient version of homomorphic encryption), and Sparsification. Empirical experiments conducted under each of the three protection mechanisms demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed algorithms.

Federated Learning (FL) provides both model performance and data privacy for machine learning tasks where samples or features are distributed among different parties. In the training process of FL, no party has a global view of data distributions or model architectures of other parties. Thus the manually-designed architectures may not be optimal. In the past, Neural Architecture Search (NAS) has been applied to FL to address this critical issue. However, existing Federated NAS approaches require prohibitive communication and computation effort, as well as the availability of high-quality labels. In this work, we present Self-supervised Vertical Federated Neural Architecture Search (SS-VFNAS) for automating FL where participants hold feature-partitioned data, a common cross-silo scenario called Vertical Federated Learning (VFL). In the proposed framework, each party first conducts NAS using self-supervised approach to find a local optimal architecture with its own data. Then, parties collaboratively improve the local optimal architecture in a VFL framework with supervision. We demonstrate experimentally that our approach has superior performance, communication efficiency and privacy compared to Federated NAS and is capable of generating high-performance and highly-transferable heterogeneous architectures even with insufficient overlapping samples, providing automation for those parties without deep learning expertise.