Using continuous-time stochastic differential equation (SDE) proxies to stochastic optimization algorithms has proven fruitful for understanding their generalization abilities. A significant part of these approaches are based on the so-called ``entropy flows'', which greatly simplify the generalization analysis. Unfortunately, such well-structured entropy flows cannot be obtained for most discrete-time algorithms, and the existing SDE approaches remain limited to specific noise and algorithmic structures. We aim to alleviate this issue by introducing a generic framework for analyzing the generalization error of Markov algorithms through `Poissonization', a continuous-time approximation of discrete-time processes with formal approximation guarantees. Through this approach, we first develop a novel entropy flow, which directly leads to PAC-Bayesian generalization bounds. We then draw novel links to modified versions of the celebrated logarithmic Sobolev inequalities (LSI), identify cases where such LSIs are satisfied, and obtain improved bounds. Beyond its generality, our framework allows exploiting specific properties of learning algorithms. In particular, we incorporate the noise structure of different algorithm types - namely, those with additional noise injections (noisy) and those without (non-noisy) - through various technical tools. This illustrates the capacity of our methods to achieve known (yet, Poissonized) and new generalization bounds.

Modern machine learning usually involves predictors in the overparametrised setting (number of trained parameters greater than dataset size), and their training yield not only good performances on training data, but also good generalisation capacity. This phenomenon challenges many theoretical results, and remains an open problem. To reach a better understanding, we provide novel generalisation bounds involving gradient terms. To do so, we combine the PAC-Bayes toolbox with Poincar\'e and Log-Sobolev inequalities, avoiding an explicit dependency on dimension of the predictor space. Our results highlight the positive influence of \emph{flat minima} (being minima with a neighbourhood nearly minimising the learning problem as well) on generalisation performances, involving directly the benefits of the optimisation phase.

This paper contains a recipe for deriving new PAC-Bayes generalisation bounds based on the $(f, \Gamma)$-divergence, and, in addition, presents PAC-Bayes generalisation bounds where we interpolate between a series of probability divergences (including but not limited to KL, Wasserstein, and total variation), making the best out of many worlds depending on the posterior distributions properties. We explore the tightness of these bounds and connect them to earlier results from statistical learning, which are specific cases. We also instantiate our bounds as training objectives, yielding non-trivial guarantees and practical performances.

Minimising upper bounds on the population risk or the generalisation gap has been widely used in structural risk minimisation (SRM) -- this is in particular at the core of PAC-Bayesian learning. Despite its successes and unfailing surge of interest in recent years, a limitation of the PAC-Bayesian framework is that most bounds involve a Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence term (or its variations), which might exhibit erratic behavior and fail to capture the underlying geometric structure of the learning problem -- hence restricting its use in practical applications. As a remedy, recent studies have attempted to replace the KL divergence in the PAC-Bayesian bounds with the Wasserstein distance. Even though these bounds alleviated the aforementioned issues to a certain extent, they either hold in expectation, are for bounded losses, or are nontrivial to minimize in an SRM framework. In this work, we contribute to this line of research and prove novel Wasserstein distance-based PAC-Bayesian generalisation bounds for both batch learning with independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) data, and online learning with potentially non-i.i.d. data. Contrary to previous art, our bounds are stronger in the sense that (i) they hold with high probability, (ii) they apply to unbounded (potentially heavy-tailed) losses, and (iii) they lead to optimizable training objectives that can be used in SRM. As a result we derive novel Wasserstein-based PAC-Bayesian learning algorithms and we illustrate their empirical advantage on a variety of experiments.

We introduce a novel strategy to train randomised predictors in federated learning, where each node of the network aims at preserving its privacy by releasing a local predictor but keeping secret its training dataset with respect to the other nodes. We then build a global randomised predictor which inherits the properties of the local private predictors in the sense of a PAC-Bayesian generalisation bound. We consider the synchronous case where all nodes share the same training objective (derived from a generalisation bound), and the asynchronous case where each node may have its own personalised training objective. We show through a series of numerical experiments that our approach achieves a comparable predictive performance to that of the batch approach where all datasets are shared across nodes. Moreover the predictors are supported by numerically nonvacuous generalisation bounds while preserving privacy for each node. We explicitly compute the increment on predictive performance and generalisation bounds between batch and federated settings, highlighting the price to pay to preserve privacy.

PAC-Bayes learning is an established framework to both assess the generalisation ability of learning algorithms, and design new learning algorithm by exploiting generalisation bounds as training objectives. Most of the exisiting bounds involve a \emph{Kullback-Leibler} (KL) divergence, which fails to capture the geometric properties of the loss function which are often useful in optimisation. We address this by extending the emerging \emph{Wasserstein PAC-Bayes} theory. We develop new PAC-Bayes bounds with Wasserstein distances replacing the usual KL, and demonstrate that sound optimisation guarantees translate to good generalisation abilities. In particular we provide generalisation bounds for the \emph{Bures-Wasserstein SGD} by exploiting its optimisation properties.

While PAC-Bayes is now an established learning framework for light-tailed losses (\emph{e.g.}, subgaussian or subexponential), its extension to the case of heavy-tailed losses remains largely uncharted and has attracted a growing interest in recent years. We contribute PAC-Bayes generalisation bounds for heavy-tailed losses under the sole assumption of bounded variance of the loss function. Under that assumption, we extend previous results from \citet{kuzborskij2019efron}. Our key technical contribution is exploiting an extention of Markov's inequality for supermartingales. Our proof technique unifies and extends different PAC-Bayesian frameworks by providing bounds for unbounded martingales as well as bounds for batch and online learning with heavy-tailed losses.

Online Learning (OL) algorithms have originally been developed to guarantee good performances when comparing their output to the best fixed strategy. The question of performance with respect to dynamic strategies remains an active research topic. We develop in this work dynamic adaptations of classical OL algorithms based on the use of experts' advice and the notion of optimism. We also propose a constructivist method to generate those advices and eventually provide both theoretical and experimental guarantees for our procedures.

Most PAC-Bayesian bounds hold in the batch learning setting where data is collected at once, prior to inference or prediction. This somewhat departs from many contemporary learning problems where data streams are collected and the algorithms must dynamically adjust. We prove new PAC-Bayesian bounds in this online learning framework, leveraging an updated definition of regret, and we revisit classical PAC-Bayesian results with a batch-to-online conversion, extending their remit to the case of dependent data. Our results hold for bounded losses, potentially \emph{non-convex}, paving the way to promising developments in online learning.

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is a popular method for dimension reduction and has attracted an unfailing interest for decades. Recently, kernel PCA has emerged as an extension of PCA but, despite its use in practice, a sound theoretical understanding of kernel PCA is missing. In this paper, we contribute lower and upper bounds on the efficiency of kernel PCA, involving the empirical eigenvalues of the kernel Gram matrix. Two bounds are for fixed estimators, and two are for randomized estimators through the PAC-Bayes theory. We control how much information is captured by kernel PCA on average, and we dissect the bounds to highlight strengths and limitations of the kernel PCA algorithm. Therefore, we contribute to the better understanding of kernel PCA. Our bounds are briefly illustrated on a toy numerical example.