Gray, Lindsey
Performance of a Geometric Deep Learning Pipeline for HL-LHC Particle Tracking
Ju, Xiangyang, Murnane, Daniel, Calafiura, Paolo, Choma, Nicholas, Conlon, Sean, Farrell, Steve, Xu, Yaoyuan, Spiropulu, Maria, Vlimant, Jean-Roch, Aurisano, Adam, Hewes, V, Cerati, Giuseppe, Gray, Lindsey, Klijnsma, Thomas, Kowalkowski, Jim, Atkinson, Markus, Neubauer, Mark, DeZoort, Gage, Thais, Savannah, Chauhan, Aditi, Schuy, Alex, Hsu, Shih-Chieh, Ballow, Alex, Lazar, and Alina
The Exa.TrkX project has applied geometric learning concepts such as metric learning and graph neural networks to HEP particle tracking. Exa.TrkX's tracking pipeline groups detector measurements to form track candidates and filters them. The pipeline, originally developed using the TrackML dataset (a simulation of an LHC-inspired tracking detector), has been demonstrated on other detectors, including DUNE Liquid Argon TPC and CMS High-Granularity Calorimeter. This paper documents new developments needed to study the physics and computing performance of the Exa.TrkX pipeline on the full TrackML dataset, a first step towards validating the pipeline using ATLAS and CMS data. The pipeline achieves tracking efficiency and purity similar to production tracking algorithms. Crucially for future HEP applications, the pipeline benefits significantly from GPU acceleration, and its computational requirements scale close to linearly with the number of particles in the event.
Track Seeding and Labelling with Embedded-space Graph Neural Networks
Choma, Nicholas, Murnane, Daniel, Ju, Xiangyang, Calafiura, Paolo, Conlon, Sean, Farrell, Steven, Prabhat, null, Cerati, Giuseppe, Gray, Lindsey, Klijnsma, Thomas, Kowalkowski, Jim, Spentzouris, Panagiotis, Vlimant, Jean-Roch, Spiropulu, Maria, Aurisano, Adam, Hewes, V, Tsaris, Aristeidis, Terao, Kazuhiro, Usher, Tracy
To address the unprecedented scale of HL-LHC data, the Exa.TrkX project is investigating a variety of machine learning approaches to particle track reconstruction. The most promising of these solutions, graph neural networks (GNN), process the event as a graph that connects track measurements (detector hits corresponding to nodes) with candidate line segments between the hits (corresponding to edges). Detector information can be associated with nodes and edges, enabling a GNN to propagate the embedded parameters around the graph and predict node-, edge- and graph-level observables. Previously, message-passing GNNs have shown success in predicting doublet likelihood, and we here report updates on the state-of-the-art architectures for this task. In addition, the Exa.TrkX project has investigated innovations in both graph construction, and embedded representations, in an effort to achieve fully learned end-to-end track finding. Hence, we present a suite of extensions to the original model, with encouraging results for hitgraph classification. In addition, we explore increased performance by constructing graphs from learned representations which contain non-linear metric structure, allowing for efficient clustering and neighborhood queries of data points. We demonstrate how this framework fits in with both traditional clustering pipelines, and GNN approaches. The embedded graphs feed into high-accuracy doublet and triplet classifiers, or can be used as an end-to-end track classifier by clustering in an embedded space. A set of post-processing methods improve performance with knowledge of the detector physics. Finally, we present numerical results on the TrackML particle tracking challenge dataset, where our framework shows favorable results in both seeding and track finding.
Machine Learning in High Energy Physics Community White Paper
Albertsson, Kim, Altoe, Piero, Anderson, Dustin, Andrews, Michael, Espinosa, Juan Pedro Araque, Aurisano, Adam, Basara, Laurent, Bevan, Adrian, Bhimji, Wahid, Bonacorsi, Daniele, Calafiura, Paolo, Campanelli, Mario, Capps, Louis, Carminati, Federico, Carrazza, Stefano, Childers, Taylor, Coniavitis, Elias, Cranmer, Kyle, David, Claire, Davis, Douglas, Duarte, Javier, Erdmann, Martin, Eschle, Jonas, Farbin, Amir, Feickert, Matthew, Castro, Nuno Filipe, Fitzpatrick, Conor, Floris, Michele, Forti, Alessandra, Garra-Tico, Jordi, Gemmler, Jochen, Girone, Maria, Glaysher, Paul, Gleyzer, Sergei, Gligorov, Vladimir, Golling, Tobias, Graw, Jonas, Gray, Lindsey, Greenwood, Dick, Hacker, Thomas, Harvey, John, Hegner, Benedikt, Heinrich, Lukas, Hooberman, Ben, Junggeburth, Johannes, Kagan, Michael, Kane, Meghan, Kanishchev, Konstantin, Karpiński, Przemysław, Kassabov, Zahari, Kaul, Gaurav, Kcira, Dorian, Keck, Thomas, Klimentov, Alexei, Kowalkowski, Jim, Kreczko, Luke, Kurepin, Alexander, Kutschke, Rob, Kuznetsov, Valentin, Köhler, Nicolas, Lakomov, Igor, Lannon, Kevin, Lassnig, Mario, Limosani, Antonio, Louppe, Gilles, Mangu, Aashrita, Mato, Pere, Meenakshi, Narain, Meinhard, Helge, Menasce, Dario, Moneta, Lorenzo, Moortgat, Seth, Neubauer, Mark, Newman, Harvey, Pabst, Hans, Paganini, Michela, Paulini, Manfred, Perdue, Gabriel, Perez, Uzziel, Picazio, Attilio, Pivarski, Jim, Prosper, Harrison, Psihas, Fernanda, Radovic, Alexander, Reece, Ryan, Rinkevicius, Aurelius, Rodrigues, Eduardo, Rorie, Jamal, Rousseau, David, Sauers, Aaron, Schramm, Steven, Schwartzman, Ariel, Severini, Horst, Seyfert, Paul, Siroky, Filip, Skazytkin, Konstantin, Sokoloff, Mike, Stewart, Graeme, Stienen, Bob, Stockdale, Ian, Strong, Giles, Thais, Savannah, Tomko, Karen, Upfal, Eli, Usai, Emanuele, Ustyuzhanin, Andrey, Vala, Martin, Vallecorsa, Sofia, Verzetti, Mauro, Vilasís-Cardona, Xavier, Vlimant, Jean-Roch, Vukotic, Ilija, Wang, Sean-Jiun, Watts, Gordon, Williams, Michael, Wu, Wenjing, Wunsch, Stefan, Zapata, Omar
Machine learning is an important research area in particle physics, beginning with applications to high-level physics analysis in the 1990s and 2000s, followed by an explosion of applications in particle and event identification and reconstruction in the 2010s. In this document we discuss promising future research and development areas in machine learning in particle physics with a roadmap for their implementation, software and hardware resource requirements, collaborative initiatives with the data science community, academia and industry, and training the particle physics community in data science. The main objective of the document is to connect and motivate these areas of research and development with the physics drivers of the High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider and future neutrino experiments and identify the resource needs for their implementation. Additionally we identify areas where collaboration with external communities will be of great benefit.