Currently, for many applications, it is necessary to know the speed and position of motors. This can be achieved using mechanical sensors coupled to the motor shaft or using sensorless techniques. The sensorless techniques in brushed dc motors can be classified into two types: 1) techniques based on the dynamic brushed dc motor model and 2) techniques based on the ripple component of the current. This paper presents a new method, based on the ripple component, for speed and position estimation in brushed dc motors, using support vector machines. The proposed method only measures the current and detects the pulses in this signal. The motor speed is estimated by using the inverse distance between the detected pulses, and the position is estimated by counting all detected pulses. The ability to detect ghost pulses and to discard false pulses is the main advantage of this method over other sensorless methods. The performed tests on two fractional horsepower brushed dc motors indicate that the method works correctly in a wide range of speeds and situations, in which the speed is constant or varies dynamically.

BLDC motor applications require precise position and speed measurements, traditionally obtained with sensors. This article presents a method for estimating those measurements without position sensors using terminal phase voltages with attenuated spurious, acquired with a FPGA that also operates a PWM-controlled inverter. Voltages are labelled with electrical and virtual rotor states using an encoder that provides training and testing data for two three-layer ANNs with perceptron-based cascade topology. The first ANN estimates the position from features of voltages with incremental timestamps, and the second ANN estimates the speed from features of position differentials considering timestamps in an acquisition window. Sensor-based training and sensorless testing at 125 to 1,500 rpm with a loaded 8-pole-pair motor obtained absolute errors of 0.8 electrical degrees and 22 rpm. Results conclude that the overall position estimation significantly improved conventional and advanced methods, and the speed estimation slightly improved conventional methods, but was worse than in advanced ones.