Advancements in large language models (LLMs) have renewed concerns about AI alignment - the consistency between human and AI goals and values. As various jurisdictions enact legislation on AI safety, the concept of alignment must be defined and measured across different domains. This paper proposes an experimental framework to assess whether LLMs adhere to ethical and legal standards in the relatively unexplored context of finance. We prompt nine LLMs to impersonate the CEO of a financial institution and test their willingness to misuse customer assets to repay outstanding corporate debt. Beginning with a baseline configuration, we adjust preferences, incentives and constraints, analyzing the impact of each adjustment with logistic regression. Our findings reveal significant heterogeneity in the baseline propensity for unethical behavior of LLMs. Factors such as risk aversion, profit expectations, and regulatory environment consistently influence misalignment in ways predicted by economic theory, although the magnitude of these effects varies across LLMs. This paper highlights both the benefits and limitations of simulation-based, ex post safety testing. While it can inform financial authorities and institutions aiming to ensure LLM safety, there is a clear trade-off between generality and cost.

Nowadays, people can retrieve and share digital information in an increasingly easy and fast fashion through the well-known digital platforms, including sensitive data, inappropriate or illegal content, and, in general, information that might serve as probative evidence in court. Consequently, to assess forensics issues, we need to figure out how to trace back to the posting chain of a digital evidence (e.g., a picture, an audio) throughout the involved platforms -- this is what Digital (also Forensics) Ballistics basically deals with. With the entry of Machine Learning as a tool of the trade in many research areas, the need for vast amounts of data has been dramatically increasing over the last few years. However, collecting or simply find the "right" datasets that properly enables data-driven research studies can turn out to be not trivial in some cases, if not extremely challenging, especially when it comes with highly specialized tasks, such as creating datasets analyzed to detect the source media platform of a given digital media. In this paper we propose an automated approach by means of a digital tool that we created on purpose. The tool is capable of automatically uploading an entire image dataset to the desired digital platform and then downloading all the uploaded pictures, thus shortening the overall time required to output the final dataset to be analyzed.

Image Forensics has already achieved great results for the source camera identification task on images. Standard approaches for data coming from Social Network Platforms cannot be applied due to different processes involved (e.g., scaling, compression, etc.). Over 1 billion images are shared each day on the Internet and obtaining information about their history from the moment they were acquired could be exploited for investigation purposes. In this paper, a classification engine for the reconstruction of the history of an image, is presented. Specifically, exploiting K-NN and decision trees classifiers and a-priori knowledge acquired through image analysis, we propose an automatic approach that can understand which Social Network Platform has processed an image and the software application used to perform the image upload. The engine makes use of proper alterations introduced by each platform as features. Results, in terms of global accuracy on a dataset of 2720 images, confirm the effectiveness of the proposed strategy.