The pursuit of quality improvements and accountability in the food supply chains, especially how they relate to food-related outcomes, such as hunger, has become increasingly vital, necessitating a comprehensive approach that encompasses product quality and its impact on various stakeholders and their communities. Such an approach offers numerous benefits in increasing product quality and eliminating superfluous measurements while appraising and alleviating the broader societal and environmental repercussions. A traceable impact management model (TIMM) provides an impact structure and a reporting mechanism that identifies each stakeholder's role in the total impact of food production and consumption stages. The model aims to increase traceability's utility in understanding the impact of changes on communities affected by food production and consumption, aligning with current and future government requirements, and addressing the needs of communities and consumers. This holistic approach is further supported by an ontological model that forms the logical foundation and a unified terminology. By proposing a holistic and integrated solution across multiple stakeholders, the model emphasizes quality and the extensive impact of championing accountability, sustainability, and responsible practices with global traceability. With these combined efforts, the food supply chain moves toward a global tracking and tracing process that not only ensures product quality but also addresses its impact on a broader scale, fostering accountability, sustainability, and responsible food production and consumption.

In this article, we describe high-fidelity human behaviour emulation model capable of ranking and re-ranking goals during plan execution based on changing emotional modes of an agent. Our model assumes the agent is rational but its reasoning is bounded. The agent's reasoning process incorporates emotions and basic human needs to emulate changes in human behaviour under cognitive limitations. The majority of cognitive systems that incorporate emotions rely on reactive models that elicit predetermined responses to emotional modes. Our model demonstrates how human emotions change during the execution of a plan independent of specific events that may elicit such responses. The initial goals of the agent are grounded in basic human needs outlined by Maslow's Hierarchy. Once a plan is generated under the cognitive limitations of the agent and execution begins, goals are re-ranked based on an emotional re-evaluation of the plan's progress. The result is a high-fidelity, domain-independent, general theory of motivation based on human needs and emotions. We demonstrate the algorithm with a use-case from the social service domain by emulating the behaviour of homeless clients in response to an intervention program.