This introduction focuses on how human-centered computing (HCC) is changing the way that people think about information technology. The AI perspective views this HCC framework as embodying a systems view, in which human thought and action are linked and equally important in terms of analysis, design, and evaluation. This emerging technology provides a new research outlook for AI applications, with new research goals and agendas.

PIM: A Novel Architecture for Coordinating Behavior of Distributed Systems

Process integrated mechanisms (PIM) offer a new approach to the problem of coordinating the activity of physically distributed systems or devices. Current approaches to coordination all have well-recognized strengths and weaknesses. We propose a novel architecture to add to the mix, called the Process Integrated Mechanism (PIM), which enjoys the advantages of having a single controlling authority while avoiding the structural difficulties that have traditionally led to its rejection in many complex settings. In many situations, PIMs improve on previous models with regard to coordination, security, ease of software development, robustness and communication overhead. In the PIM architecture, the components are conceived as parts of a single mechanism, even when they are physically separated and operate asynchronously. The PIM models offers promise as an effective infrastructure for handling tasks that require a high degree of time-sensitive coordination between the components, as well as a clean mechanism for coordinating the high-level goals of loosely coupled systems. PIM models enable coordination without the fragility and high communication overhead of centralized control, but also without the uncertainty associated with the system-level behavior of a MAS.The PIM model provides an ease of programming with advantages over both multi-agent sys-tems and centralized architectures. It has the robustness of a multi-agent system without the significant complexity and overhead required for inter-agent communication and negotiation. In contrast to centralized approaches, it does not require managing the large amounts of data that the coordinating process needs to compute a global view. In a PIM, the process moves to the data and may perform computations on the components where the data is locally available, sharing only the information needed for coordination of the other components. While there are many remaining research issues to be addressed, we believe that PIMs offer an important and novel tech-nique for the control of distributed systems.

Confess your sins, O my sisters and brothers, points joyfully that really substantial progress in this that they shall be lifted from your shoulders. The sinner is working hard in some AI area. It believes that it the old list here. This formalism writes a paper saying so; but does nothing else. Kant, Hegel, Wittgenstein, Hume, Sarte,...) has also builds up around this particular formalism.

Our subject has been compared to Mozart. His both in the popular media and its corrupting moral influence on society, proofs are ingenious, cleverly argued, among the cultured intelligentsia. Lanier's home page: While many of these attacks are cited "... machine decision making is widely, most of them are ridiculous running our household finances to anyone with an appropriate technical to a scary degree. Our demonstrated - Sir John Eccles for the "Mysterious willingness to accommodate machines Loom Theory." AI…lets strategists Thus, the Simon Newcomb award imagine less gruesome warfare this year goes to Jaron Lanier. He is an essayist whose views can be found in such magazines All of this ill-informed pseudo-political as Harpers and Wired; he is also, ranting is remarkably silly, but according to his web page, "available none of it can really be said to constitute for public speaking." He is widely regarded an argument. The first part of the argument is clearly inspired by Searle's magnificent reductio, though performed in a very different style. Recall that Searle's those numbers are a computer Obviously one is supposed to think argument amounts to the claim program. Lanier then makes the move that any sufficiently complex physical through all the possible computers which wins him this year's Award: system--the atoms in a wall, say that could exist … until you "You say the rainstorm is not --has within it a pattern which could find one that treats the raindrop really doing computation--it is be the encoding of a given piece of patterns as a program exactly just sitting there as a passive program--and software--a word-processor, for instance--and equivalent to your brain." Perhaps there's something "Yes, it can be done..." [Since the Now the raindrops are reduce to nonsense, that a program There's a technical slip here: the doing the computing."

I'm Not in Love (or Love's Labours Lost) A program cannot know what it is like to fall in love (See "Being and Lovingness," ed. Your claim that it would be "irresponsible" to show me the contents of your alleged Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2021 Kbase is a crude evasion of academic honesty. To: Lovecraft@ruth-whitehouse.com Your claim to have "perfect understanding" of A. Argaiv From: argaiv@great-western.edu a subject as complex and elusive as human emotion is ridiculous. Please forward my original considered. Greek hexameters?? Try LyreLyre!! ] request to someone in your organization who According to a recent survey, your web service Dear Professor Argaiv: can answer it more responsibly.

Lull's writings advanced the idea vert to Christianity because of a cognitive that non-mathematical reasoning can in artificial intelligence have defect. Some of appreciate the vast array of the combinations process, and that reasoning the most fundamental, surely, are that of God's or Christ's virtues. But does not proceed by syllogism, but by thinking is a computational process, Lull believed that infidels could be combinatorics. The decomposition can be made mechanical, and that the Further, he thought that a representation and recombination of attributes can be mathematics of computation involves of those combinations could represented by the decomposition and combinatorics. All of these ideas have be effectively presented by means of recombination of symbols, and that, as their origin, so far as we know, in the appropriate machines, and that was Lull's devices illustrate, is a process that work of an eccentric 13th century the key to his new method.

One of the best things about conferences, as we all know, is the opportunity they afford to consolidate old friendships and make new contacts. Clusters of con-versation provide a more valuable way to spend ones time than attending sessions. At the last national meeting we escaped from the celebrations of the recent victory of Deep Blue over the dreaded Kasparov, to find just such a group, already engaged in an animated discussion ....

With a power screwdriver the computer, the web, robots, the Europe the Hindu-Arabic system of anyone can drive the hardest screw; automation of manufacturing will all numbers and the arithmetic algorithms with a calculator, anyone can get the conspire to separate the rich and they made possible. One of the numbers right; with an aircraft anyone quick from the poor and slow, hurrying first books after the Bible printed with can fly to Paris; and with Deep the trend to an informed, skilled, moveable type was an Arithmetic. Blue, anyone can beat the world chess and employed elite living among an Even so, the algorithms were not easy champion. Cognitive prostheses undermine uninformed, unskilled, and unemployed and not widely disseminated. But both history and 17th century tradesman could not by giving non-experts equivalent an understanding of human-machine multiply.

Date: 4/1/2002 WASA -- World Aeronautics & Space Administration Executive Summary of Committee Report on Disaster Investigation, Incident # 362 Analysis of records downloaded from the 2001 Jupiter Orbital Black Parallelopiped Investigation Mission indicates that the basic source of failure was excessive emotional stress in the HAL computer, leading to a previously unknown condition now called Computational Paranoia. This in turn was an unforeseen side-effect of the design of the HAL-9000 series. HAL was given a genuine personality, enabling it to act as an onboard psychiatric advisor, colleague, and confidante to the human crew members. As a consequence, much of HAL's perceptual software was devoted to reading subtleties of facial expression, unconscious intonation stresses, and other emotional signals. Its performance at empathy and emotional insight was at least two orders of magnitude (as measured by the Kraft-Ebbing-Rachmaninoff method) better than that of the rest of the crew.