This work investigates and evaluates multiple defense strategies against property inference attacks (PIAs), a privacy attack against machine learning models. Given a trained machine learning model, PIAs aim to extract statistical properties of its underlying training data, e.g., reveal the ratio of men and women in a medical training data set. While for other privacy attacks like membership inference, a lot of research on defense mechanisms has been published, this is the first work focusing on defending against PIAs. With the primary goal of developing a generic mitigation strategy against white-box PIAs, we propose the novel approach property unlearning. Extensive experiments with property unlearning show that while it is very effective when defending target models against specific adversaries, property unlearning is not able to generalize, i.e., protect against a whole class of PIAs. To investigate the reasons behind this limitation, we present the results of experiments with the explainable AI tool LIME. They show how state-of-the-art property inference adversaries with the same objective focus on different parts of the target model. We further elaborate on this with a follow-up experiment, in which we use the visualization technique t-SNE to exhibit how severely statistical training data properties are manifested in machine learning models. Based on this, we develop the conjecture that post-training techniques like property unlearning might not suffice to provide the desirable generic protection against PIAs. As an alternative, we investigate the effects of simpler training data preprocessing methods like adding Gaussian noise to images of a training data set on the success rate of PIAs. We conclude with a discussion of the different defense approaches, summarize the lessons learned and provide directions for future work.

This work investigates the potential of Federated Learning (FL) for official statistics and shows how well the performance of FL models can keep up with centralized learning methods. FL is particularly interesting for official statistics because its utilization can safeguard the privacy of data holders, thus facilitating access to a broader range of data. By simulating three different use cases, important insights on the applicability of the technology are gained. The use cases are based on a medical insurance data set, a fine dust pollution data set and a mobile radio coverage data set - all of which are from domains close to official statistics. We provide a detailed analysis of the results, including a comparison of centralized and FL algorithm performances for each simulation. In all three use cases, we were able to train models via FL which reach a performance very close to the centralized model benchmarks. Our key observations and their implications for transferring the simulations into practice are summarized. We arrive at the conclusion that FL has the potential to emerge as a pivotal technology in future use cases of official statistics.