Dyer, Michael G.
Propagation Filters in PDS Networks for Sequencing and Ambiguity Resolution
Sumida, Ronald A., Dyer, Michael G.
We present a Parallel Distributed Semantic (PDS) Network architecture that addresses the problems of sequencing and ambiguity resolution in natural language understanding. A PDS Network stores phrases and their meanings using multiple PDP networks, structured in the form of a semantic net. A mechanism called Propagation Filters is employed: (1) to control communication between networks, (2) to properly sequence the components of a phrase, and (3) to resolve ambiguities. Simulation results indicate that PDS Networks and Propagation Filters can successfully represent high-level knowledge, can be trained relatively quickly, and provide for parallel inferencing at the knowledge level. 1 INTRODUCTION Backpropagation has shown considerable potential for addressing problems in natural language processing (NLP). However, the traditional PDP [Rumelhart and McClelland, 1986] approach of using one (or a small number) of backprop networks for NLP has been plagued by a number of problems: (1) it has been largely unsuccessful at representing high-level knowledge, (2) the networks are slow to train, and (3) they are sequential at the knowledge level.
Propagation Filters in PDS Networks for Sequencing and Ambiguity Resolution
Sumida, Ronald A., Dyer, Michael G.
We present a Parallel Distributed Semantic (PDS) Network architecture that addresses the problems of sequencing and ambiguity resolution in natural language understanding. A PDS Network stores phrases and their meanings using multiple PDP networks, structured in the form of a semantic net.A mechanism called Propagation Filters is employed: (1) to control communication between networks, (2) to properly sequence the components of a phrase, and (3) to resolve ambiguities. Simulation results indicate that PDS Networks and Propagation Filters can successfully represent high-levelknowledge, can be trained relatively quickly, and provide for parallel inferencing at the knowledge level. 1 INTRODUCTION Backpropagation has shown considerable potential for addressing problems in natural languageprocessing (NLP). However, the traditional PDP [Rumelhart and McClelland, 1986] approach of using one (or a small number) of backprop networks for NLP has been plagued by a number of problems: (1) it has been largely unsuccessful atrepresenting high-level knowledge, (2) the networks are slow to train, and (3) they are sequential at the knowledge level. A solution to these problems is to represent high-level knowledge structures over a large number of smaller PDP net-233 234 Sumida and Dyer works.
Propagation Filters in PDS Networks for Sequencing and Ambiguity Resolution
Sumida, Ronald A., Dyer, Michael G.
We present a Parallel Distributed Semantic (PDS) Network architecture that addresses the problems of sequencing and ambiguity resolution in natural language understanding. A PDS Network stores phrases and their meanings using multiple PDP networks, structured in the form of a semantic net. A mechanism called Propagation Filters is employed: (1) to control communication between networks, (2) to properly sequence the components of a phrase, and (3) to resolve ambiguities. Simulation results indicate that PDS Networks and Propagation Filters can successfully represent high-level knowledge, can be trained relatively quickly, and provide for parallel inferencing at the knowledge level. 1 INTRODUCTION Backpropagation has shown considerable potential for addressing problems in natural language processing (NLP). However, the traditional PDP [Rumelhart and McClelland, 1986] approach of using one (or a small number) of backprop networks for NLP has been plagued by a number of problems: (1) it has been largely unsuccessful at representing high-level knowledge, (2) the networks are slow to train, and (3) they are sequential at the knowledge level.
Dynamic, Non-Local Role Bindings and Inferencing in a Localist Network for Natural Language Understanding
Lange, Trent E., Dyer, Michael G.
This paper introduces a means to handle the critical problem of nonlocal role-bindingsin localist spreading-activation networks. Every conceptual node in the network broadcasts a stable, uniquely-identifying activation pattern, called its signature. A dynamic role-binding is created whena role's binding node has an activation that matches the bound concept's signature. Most importantly, signatures are propagated across long paths of nodes to handle the non-local role-bindings necessary forinferencing. Our localist network model, ROBIN (ROle Binding and Inferencing Network), uses signature activations to robustly representschemata role-bindings and thus perfonn the inferencing, plan/goal analysis, schema instantiation, word-sense disambiguation, anddynamic reinterpretation portions of the natural language understanding process.
Artificial Intelligence Research at the University of California, Los Angeles
Dyer, Michael G.
Research in AI within the Computer Science Department at the University of California, Los Angeles is loosely composed of three interacting and cooperating groups: (1) the Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, at 3677 Boelter Hall, which is concerned mainly with natural language processing and cognitive modelling, (2) the Cognitive Systems Laboratory, at 4731 Boelter Hall, which studies the nature of search, logic programming, heuristics, and formal methods, and (3) the Robotics and Vision Laboratory, at 3532 Boelter Hall, where research concentrates on robot control in manufacturing, pattern recognition, and expert systems for real-time processing.
Artificial Intelligence Research at the University of California, Los Angeles
Dyer, Michael G.
Research in AI within the Computer Science Department at the University of California, Los Angeles is loosely composed of three interacting and cooperating groups: (1) the Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, at 3677 Boelter Hall, which is concerned mainly with natural language processing and cognitive modelling, (2) the Cognitive Systems Laboratory, at 4731 Boelter Hall, which studies the nature of search, logic programming, heuristics, and formal methods, and (3) the Robotics and Vision Laboratory, at 3532 Boelter Hall, where research concentrates on robot control in manufacturing, pattern recognition, and expert systems for real-time processing.