Dror, Gideon
Cross Modal Distillation for Flood Extent Mapping
Garg, Shubhika, Feinstein, Ben, Timnat, Shahar, Batchu, Vishal, Dror, Gideon, Rosenthal, Adi Gerzi, Gulshan, Varun
The increasing intensity and frequency of floods is one of the many consequences of our changing climate. In this work, we explore ML techniques that improve the flood detection module of an operational early flood warning system. Our method exploits an unlabelled dataset of paired multi-spectral and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery to reduce the labeling requirements of a purely supervised learning method. Prior works have used unlabelled data by creating weak labels out of them. However, from our experiments we noticed that such a model still ends up learning the label mistakes in those weak labels. Motivated by knowledge distillation and semi supervised learning, we explore the use of a teacher to train a student with the help of a small hand labelled dataset and a large unlabelled dataset. Unlike the conventional self distillation setup, we propose a cross modal distillation framework that transfers supervision from a teacher trained on richer modality (multi-spectral images) to a student model trained on SAR imagery. The trained models are then tested on the Sen1Floods11 dataset. Our model outperforms the Sen1Floods11 baseline model trained on the weak labeled SAR imagery by an absolute margin of 6.53% Intersection-over-Union (IoU) on the test split.
A Humanlike Predictor of Facial Attractiveness
Kagian, Amit, Dror, Gideon, Leyvand, Tommer, Cohen-or, Daniel, Ruppin, Eytan
This work presents a method for estimating human facial attractiveness, based on supervised learning techniques. Numerous facial features that describe facial geometry, color and texture, combined with an average human attractiveness score for each facial image, are used to train various predictors. Facial attractiveness ratings produced by the final predictor are found to be highly correlated with human ratings, markedly improving previous machine learning achievements. Simulated psychophysical experiments with virtually manipulated images reveal preferences in the machine's judgments which are remarkably similar to those of humans. These experiments shed new light on existing theories of facial attractiveness such as the averageness, smoothness and symmetry hypotheses. It is intriguing to find that a machine trained explicitly to capture an operational performance criteria such as attractiveness rating, implicitly captures basic human psychophysical biases characterizing the perception of facial attractiveness in general.
Result Analysis of the NIPS 2003 Feature Selection Challenge
Guyon, Isabelle, Gunn, Steve, Ben-Hur, Asa, Dror, Gideon
The NIPS 2003 workshops included a feature selection competition organizedby the authors. We provided participants with five datasets from different application domains and called for classification resultsusing a minimal number of features. The competition took place over a period of 13 weeks and attracted 78 research groups. Participants were asked to make online submissions on the validation and test sets, with performance on the validation set being presented immediately to the participant and performance on the test set presented to the participants at the workshop. In total 1863 entries were made on the validation sets during the development period and 135 entries on all test sets for the final competition. The winners used a combination of Bayesian neural networkswith ARD priors and Dirichlet diffusion trees. Other top entries used a variety of methods for feature selection, which combined filters and/or wrapper or embedded methods using Random Forests,kernel methods, or neural networks as a classification engine. The results of the benchmark (including the predictions made by the participants and the features they selected) and the scoring software are publicly available. The benchmark is available at www.nipsfsc.ecs.soton.ac.uk for post-challenge submissions to stimulate further research.
Vertex Identification in High Energy Physics Experiments
Dror, Gideon, Abramowicz, Halina, Horn, David
In High Energy Physics experiments one has to sort through a high flux of events, at a rate of tens of MHz, and select the few that are of interest. One of the key factors in making this decision is the location of the vertex where the interaction, that led to the event, took place. Here we present a novel solution to the problem of finding the location of the vertex, based on two feedforward neural networkswith fixed architectures, whose parameters are chosen so as to obtain a high accuracy. The system is tested on simulated datasets, and is shown to perform better than conventional algorithms. 1 Introduction An event in High Energy Physics (HEP) is the experimental result of an interaction during the collision of particles in an accelerator. The result of this interaction is the production of tens of particles, each of which is ejected in a different direction and energy. Due to the quantum mechanical effects involved, the events differ from one another in the number of particles produced, the types of particles, and their energies. The trajectories of produced particles are detected by a very large and sophisticated detector.
Vertex Identification in High Energy Physics Experiments
Dror, Gideon, Abramowicz, Halina, Horn, David
In High Energy Physics experiments one has to sort through a high flux of events, at a rate of tens of MHz, and select the few that are of interest. One of the key factors in making this decision is the location of the vertex where the interaction, that led to the event, took place. Here we present a novel solution to the problem of finding the location of the vertex, based on two feedforward neural networks with fixed architectures, whose parameters are chosen so as to obtain a high accuracy. The system is tested on simulated data sets, and is shown to perform better than conventional algorithms. 1 Introduction An event in High Energy Physics (HEP) is the experimental result of an interaction during the collision of particles in an accelerator. The result of this interaction is the production of tens of particles, each of which is ejected in a different direction and energy. Due to the quantum mechanical effects involved, the events differ from one another in the number of particles produced, the types of particles, and their energies. The trajectories of produced particles are detected by a very large and sophisticated detector.