This work proposes a dynamic and adversarial resource allocation problem in a graph environment, which is referred to as the dynamic Defender-Attacker Blotto (dDAB) game. A team of defender robots is tasked to ensure numerical advantage at every node in the graph against a team of attacker robots. The engagement is formulated as a discrete-time dynamic game, where the two teams reallocate their robots in sequence and each robot can move at most one hop at each time step. The game terminates with the attacker's victory if any node has more attacker robots than defender robots. Our goal is to identify the necessary and sufficient number of defender robots to guarantee defense. Through a reachability analysis, we first solve the problem for the case where the attacker team stays as a single group. The results are then generalized to the case where the attacker team can freely split and merge into subteams. Crucially, our analysis indicates that there is no incentive for the attacker team to split, which significantly reduces the search space for the attacker's winning strategies and also enables us to design defender counter-strategies using superposition. We also present an efficient numerical algorithm to identify the necessary and sufficient number of defender robots to defend a given graph. Finally, we present illustrative examples to verify the efficacy of the proposed framework.

We consider a variant of the target defense problem where a single defender is tasked to capture a sequence of incoming intruders. The intruders' objective is to breach the target boundary without being captured by the defender. As soon as the current intruder breaches the target or gets captured by the defender, the next intruder appears at a random location on a fixed circle surrounding the target. Therefore, the defender's final location at the end of the current game becomes its initial location for the next game. Thus, the players pick strategies that are advantageous for the current as well as for the future games. Depending on the information available to the players, each game is divided into two phases: partial information and full information phase. Under some assumptions on the sensing and speed capabilities, we analyze the agents' strategies in both phases. We derive equilibrium strategies for both the players to optimize the capture percentage using the notions of engagement surface and capture circle. We quantify the percentage of capture for both finite and infinite sequences of incoming intruders.

Much work has been dedicated to the exploration of Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) paradigms implementing a centralized learning with decentralized execution (CLDE) approach to achieve human-like collaboration in cooperative tasks. Here, we discuss variations of centralized training and describe a recent survey of algorithmic approaches. The goal is to explore how different implementations of information sharing mechanism in centralized learning may give rise to distinct group coordinated behaviors in multi-agent systems performing cooperative tasks.