In MOO, there is usually not a single optimal solution, but a range of so-called Pareto optimal or non-dominated Many real-world black-box optimization problems solutions with different trade-offs. A widely adopted approach have multiple conflicting objectives. Rather aims to search for a good representation of these than attempting to approximate the entire set of Pareto-optimal solutions by maximizing their hypervolume. Pareto-optimal solutions, interactive preference Two prominent methods stand out in this regard: ParEGO learning, i.e., optimization with a decision maker (Knowles, 2006), which employs random augmented Chebyshev in the loop, allows to focus the search on the scalarizations for optimization in each iteration, and most relevant subset. However, few previous studies expected hypervolume maximization (Yang et al., 2019; have exploited the fact that utility functions Daulton et al., 2020), which directly maximizes the hypervolume are usually monotonic.

Bilevel optimization, a hierarchical mathematical framework where one optimization problem is nested within another, has emerged as a powerful tool for modeling complex decision-making processes in various fields such as economics, engineering, and machine learning. This paper focuses on bilevel optimization where both upper-level and lower-level functions are black boxes and expensive to evaluate. We propose a Bayesian Optimization framework that models the upper and lower-level functions as Gaussian processes over the combined space of upper and lower-level decisions, allowing us to exploit knowledge transfer between different sub-problems. Additionally, we propose a novel acquisition function for this model. Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm is highly sample-efficient and outperforms existing methods in finding high-quality solutions.

In many real-world optimization problems, we have prior information about what objective function values are achievable. In this paper, we study the scenario that we have either exact knowledge of the minimum value or a, possibly inexact, lower bound on its value. We propose bound-aware Bayesian optimization (BABO), a Bayesian optimization method that uses a new surrogate model and acquisition function to utilize such prior information. We present SlogGP, a new surrogate model that incorporates bound information and adapts the Expected Improvement (EI) acquisition function accordingly. Empirical results on a variety of benchmarks demonstrate the benefit of taking prior information about the optimal value into account, and that the proposed approach significantly outperforms existing techniques. Furthermore, we notice that even in the absence of prior information on the bound, the proposed SlogGP surrogate model still performs better than the standard GP model in most cases, which we explain by its larger expressiveness.

Clustering in dynamic environments is of increasing importance, with broad applications ranging from real-time data analysis and online unsupervised learning to dynamic facility location problems. While meta-heuristics have shown promising effectiveness in static clustering tasks, their application for tracking optimal clustering solutions or robust clustering over time in dynamic environments remains largely underexplored. This is partly due to a lack of dynamic datasets with diverse, controllable, and realistic dynamic characteristics, hindering systematic performance evaluations of clustering algorithms in various dynamic scenarios. This deficiency leads to a gap in our understanding and capability to effectively design algorithms for clustering in dynamic environments. To bridge this gap, this paper introduces the Dynamic Dataset Generator (DDG). DDG features multiple dynamic Gaussian components integrated with a range of heterogeneous, local, and global changes. These changes vary in spatial and temporal severity, patterns, and domain of influence, providing a comprehensive tool for simulating a wide range of dynamic scenarios.

The graph colouring problem consists of assigning labels, or colours, to the vertices of a graph such that no two adjacent vertices share the same colour. In this work we investigate whether deep reinforcement learning can be used to discover a competitive construction heuristic for graph colouring. Our proposed approach, ReLCol, uses deep Q-learning together with a graph neural network for feature extraction, and employs a novel way of parameterising the graph that results in improved performance. Using standard benchmark graphs with varied topologies, we empirically evaluate the benefits and limitations of the heuristic learned by ReLCol relative to existing construction algorithms, and demonstrate that reinforcement learning is a promising direction for further research on the graph colouring problem.

Multi-objective Bayesian optimization aims to find the Pareto front of optimal trade-offs between a set of expensive objectives while collecting as few samples as possible. In some cases, it is possible to evaluate the objectives separately, and a different latency or evaluation cost can be associated with each objective. This presents an opportunity to learn the Pareto front faster by evaluating the cheaper objectives more frequently. We propose a scalarization based knowledge gradient acquisition function which accounts for the different evaluation costs of the objectives. We prove consistency of the algorithm and show empirically that it significantly outperforms a benchmark algorithm which always evaluates both objectives.

This document describes the generalized moving peaks benchmark (GMPB) and how it can be used to generate problem instances for continuous large-scale dynamic optimization problems. It presents a set of 15 benchmark problems, the relevant source code, and a performance indicator, designed for comparative studies and competitions in large-scale dynamic optimization. Although its primary purpose is to provide a coherent basis for running competitions, its generality allows the interested reader to use this document as a guide to design customized problem instances to investigate issues beyond the scope of the presented benchmark suite. To this end, we explain the modular structure of the GMPB and how its constituents can be assembled to form problem instances with a variety of controllable characteristics ranging from unimodal to highly multimodal, symmetric to highly asymmetric, smooth to highly irregular, and various degrees of variable interaction and ill-conditioning.

Many real-world optimisation problems such as hyperparameter tuning in machine learning or simulation-based optimisation can be formulated as expensive-to-evaluate black-box functions. A popular approach to tackle such problems is Bayesian optimisation (BO), which builds a response surface model based on the data collected so far, and uses the mean and uncertainty predicted by the model to decide what information to collect next. In this paper, we propose a novel variant of the well-known Knowledge Gradient acquisition function that allows it to handle constraints. We empirically compare the new algorithm with four other state-of-the-art constrained Bayesian optimisation algorithms and demonstrate its superior performance. We also prove theoretical convergence in the infinite budget limit.

Experimental studies are prevalent in Evolutionary Computation (EC), and concerns about the reproducibility and replicability of such studies have increased in recent times, reflecting similar concerns in other scientific fields. In this article, we suggest a classification of different types of reproducibility that refines the badge system of the Association of Computing Machinery (ACM) adopted by TELO. We discuss, within the context of EC, the different types of reproducibility as well as the concepts of artifact and measurement, which are crucial for claiming reproducibility. We identify cultural and technical obstacles to reproducibility in the EC field. Finally, we provide guidelines and suggest tools that may help to overcome some of these reproducibility obstacles.

Simulators often require calibration inputs estimated from real world data and the quality of the estimate can significantly affect simulation output. Particularly when performing simulation optimisation to find an optimal solution, the uncertainty in the inputs significantly affects the quality of the found solution. One remedy is to search for the solution that has the best performance on average over the uncertain range of inputs yielding an optimal compromise solution. We consider the more general setting where a user may choose between either running simulations or instead collecting real world data. A user may choose an input and a solution and observe the simulation output, or instead query an external data source improving the input estimate enabling the search for a more focused, less compromised solution. We explicitly examine the trade-off between simulation and real data collection in order to find the optimal solution of the simulator with the true inputs. Using a value of information procedure, we propose a novel unified simulation optimisation procedure called Bayesian Information Collection and Optimisation (BICO) that, in each iteration, automatically determines which of the two actions (running simulations or data collection) is more beneficial. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the proposed algorithm is able to automatically determine an appropriate balance between optimisation and data collection.