Dataset distillation (DD) has emerged as a promising approach to compress datasets and speed up model training. However, the underlying connections among various DD methods remain largely unexplored. In this paper, we introduce UniDD, a spectral filtering framework that unifies diverse DD objectives. UniDD interprets each DD objective as a specific filter function that affects the eigenvalues of the feature-feature correlation (FFC) matrix and modulates the frequency components of the feature-label correlation (FLC) matrix. In this way, UniDD reveals that the essence of DD fundamentally lies in matching frequency-specific features. Moreover, according to the filter behaviors, we classify existing methods into low-frequency matching and high-frequency matching, encoding global texture and local details, respectively. However, existing methods rely on fixed filter functions throughout distillation, which cannot capture the low- and high-frequency information simultaneously. To address this limitation, we further propose Curriculum Frequency Matching (CFM), which gradually adjusts the filter parameter to cover both low- and high-frequency information of the FFC and FLC matrices. Extensive experiments on small-scale datasets, such as CIFAR-10/100, and large-scale datasets, including ImageNet-1K, demonstrate the superior performance of CFM over existing baselines and validate the practicality of UniDD.

The history of artificial intelligence (AI) has witnessed the significant impact of high-quality data on various deep learning models, such as ImageNet for AlexNet and ResNet. Recently, instead of designing more complex neural architectures as model-centric approaches, the attention of AI community has shifted to data-centric ones, which focuses on better processing data to strengthen the ability of neural models. Graph learning, which operates on ubiquitous topological data, also plays an important role in the era of deep learning. In this survey, we comprehensively review graph learning approaches from the data-centric perspective, and aim to answer three crucial questions: (1) when to modify graph data, (2) what part of the graph data needs modification to unlock the potential of various graph models, and (3) how to safeguard graph models from problematic data influence. Accordingly, we propose a novel taxonomy based on the stages in the graph learning pipeline, and highlight the processing methods for different data structures in the graph data, i.e., topology, feature and label. Furthermore, we analyze some potential problems embedded in graph data and discuss how to solve them in a data-centric manner. Finally, we provide some promising future directions for data-centric graph learning.

The increasing amount of graph data places requirements on the efficiency and scalability of graph neural networks (GNNs), despite their effectiveness in various graph-related applications. Recently, the emerging graph condensation (GC) sheds light on reducing the computational cost of GNNs from a data perspective. It aims to replace the real large graph with a significantly smaller synthetic graph so that GNNs trained on both graphs exhibit comparable performance. However, our empirical investigation reveals that existing GC methods suffer from poor generalization, i.e., different GNNs trained on the same synthetic graph have obvious performance gaps. What factors hinder the generalization of GC and how can we mitigate it? To answer this question, we commence with a detailed analysis and observe that GNNs will inject spectrum bias into the synthetic graph, resulting in a distribution shift. To tackle this issue, we propose eigenbasis matching for spectrum-free graph condensation, named GCEM, which has two key steps: First, GCEM matches the eigenbasis of the real and synthetic graphs, rather than the graph structure, which eliminates the spectrum bias of GNNs. Subsequently, GCEM leverages the spectrum of the real graph and the synthetic eigenbasis to construct the synthetic graph, thereby preserving the essential structural information. We theoretically demonstrate that the synthetic graph generated by GCEM maintains the spectral similarity, i.e., total variation, of the real graph. Extensive experiments conducted on five graph datasets verify that GCEM not only achieves state-of-the-art performance over baselines but also significantly narrows the performance gaps between different GNNs.

Spectral graph neural networks (GNNs) learn graph representations via spectral-domain graph convolutions. However, most existing spectral graph filters are scalar-to-scalar functions, i.e., mapping a single eigenvalue to a single filtered value, thus ignoring the global pattern of the spectrum. Furthermore, these filters are often constructed based on some fixed-order polynomials, which have limited expressiveness and flexibility. To tackle these issues, we introduce Specformer, which effectively encodes the set of all eigenvalues and performs self-attention in the spectral domain, leading to a learnable set-to-set spectral filter. We also design a decoder with learnable bases to enable non-local graph convolution. Importantly, Specformer is equivariant to permutation. By stacking multiple Specformer layers, one can build a powerful spectral GNN. On synthetic datasets, we show that our Specformer can better recover ground-truth spectral filters than other spectral GNNs. Extensive experiments of both node-level and graph-level tasks on real-world graph datasets show that our Specformer outperforms state-of-the-art GNNs and learns meaningful spectrum patterns. Code and data are available at https://github.com/bdy9527/Specformer.

Graph neural networks (GNNs) have attracted considerable attention from the research community. It is well established that GNNs are usually roughly divided into spatial and spectral methods. Despite that spectral GNNs play an important role in both graph signal processing and graph representation learning, existing studies are biased toward spatial approaches, and there is no comprehensive review on spectral GNNs so far. In this paper, we summarize the recent development of spectral GNNs, including model, theory, and application. Specifically, we first discuss the connection between spatial GNNs and spectral GNNs, which shows that spectral GNNs can capture global information and have better expressiveness and interpretability. Next, we categorize existing spectral GNNs according to the spectrum information they use, \ie, eigenvalues or eigenvectors. In addition, we review major theoretical results and applications of spectral GNNs, followed by a quantitative experiment to benchmark some popular spectral GNNs. Finally, we conclude the paper with some future directions.