Marketers spend billions of dollars on advertisements but to what end? At the time of purchase, if customers cannot recognize the brand for which they saw an ad, the money spent on the ad is essentially wasted. Despite its importance in marketing, until now, there has been no study on the memorability of ads in the ML literature. Most studies have been conducted on short-term recall (<5 mins) on specific content types like object and action videos. On the other hand, the advertising industry only cares about long-term memorability, and ads are almost always highly multimodal, depicting a story through its different modalities. With this motivation, we release the first large-scale memorability dataset, LAMDBA, consisting of 1749 participants and 2205 ads covering 276 brands. Running statistical tests over different participant subpopulations and ad types, we find many interesting insights into what makes an ad memorable. For e.g., we find that brands that use commercials with fast-moving scenes are more memorable than those with slower scenes (p=8e-10) and that people who use ad-blockers remember fewer ads than those who don't (p=5e-3). Next, to simulate the memorability of marketing materials for a particular audience, we present a novel model, Henry, trained to leverage real-world knowledge of LLMs and visual knowledge to predict the memorability. We test Henry on all the prominent memorability datasets in literature (both images and videos) and achieve state-of-the-art performance across all of them. Henry shows strong generalization showing better results in 0-shot on unseen datasets. Next, we propose the task of memorable ad generation and release a large-scale ad dataset, UltraLAMBDA, consisting of 4 million ads with their Henry-assigned memorability scores. We show that aligning Henry to generate memorable content improves memorability scores by more than 25%.

Shannon, in his seminal paper introducing information theory, divided the communication into three levels: technical, semantic, and effectivenss. While the technical level is concerned with accurate reconstruction of transmitted symbols, the semantic and effectiveness levels deal with the inferred meaning and its effect on the receiver. Thanks to telecommunications, the first level problem has produced great advances like the internet. Large Language Models (LLMs) make some progress towards the second goal, but the third level still remains largely untouched. The third problem deals with predicting and optimizing communication for desired receiver behavior. LLMs, while showing wide generalization capabilities across a wide range of tasks, are unable to solve for this. One reason for the underperformance could be a lack of ``behavior tokens'' in LLMs' training corpora. Behavior tokens define receiver behavior over a communication, such as shares, likes, clicks, purchases, retweets, etc. While preprocessing data for LLM training, behavior tokens are often removed from the corpora as noise. Therefore, in this paper, we make some initial progress towards reintroducing behavior tokens in LLM training. The trained models, other than showing similar performance to LLMs on content understanding tasks, show generalization capabilities on behavior simulation, content simulation, behavior understanding, and behavior domain adaptation. Using a wide range of tasks on two corpora, we show results on all these capabilities. We call these models Large Content and Behavior Models (LCBMs). Further, to spur more research on LCBMs, we release our new Content Behavior Corpus (CBC), a repository containing communicator, message, and corresponding receiver behavior.