This paper introduces a new learning-based approach for approximately solving the Kidney-Exchange Problem (KEP), an NP-hard problem on graphs. The problem consists of, given a pool of kidney donors and patients waiting for kidney donations, optimally selecting a set of donations to optimize the quantity and quality of transplants performed while respecting a set of constraints about the arrangement of these donations. The proposed technique consists of two main steps: the first is a Graph Neural Network (GNN) trained without supervision; the second is a deterministic non-learned search heuristic that uses the output of the GNN to find paths and cycles. To allow for comparisons, we also implemented and tested an exact solution method using integer programming, two greedy search heuristics without the machine learning module, and the GNN alone without a heuristic. We analyze and compare the methods and conclude that the learning-based two-stage approach is the best solution quality, outputting approximate solutions on average 1.1 times more valuable than the ones from the deterministic heuristic alone.

Recently, the use of sound measures and metrics in Artificial Intelligence has become the subject of interest of academia, government, and industry. Efforts towards measuring different phenomena have gained traction in the AI community, as illustrated by the publication of several influential field reports and policy documents. These metrics are designed to help decision takers to inform themselves about the fast-moving and impacting influences of key advances in Artificial Intelligence in general and Machine Learning in particular. In this paper we propose to use such newfound capabilities of AI technologies to augment our AI measuring capabilities. We do so by training a model to classify publications related to ethical issues and concerns. In our methodology we use an expert, manually curated dataset as the training set and then evaluate a large set of research papers. Finally, we highlight the implications of AI metrics, in particular their contribution towards developing trustful and fair AI-based tools and technologies. Keywords: AI Ethics; AI Fairness; AI Measurement. Ethics in Computer Science.

Recently, the deep learning community has given growing attention to neural architectures engineered to learn problems in relational domains. Convolutional Neural Networks employ parameter sharing over the image domain, tying the weights of neural connections on a grid topology and thus enforcing the learning of a number of convolutional kernels. By instantiating trainable neural modules and assembling them in varied configurations (apart from grids), one can enforce parameter sharing over graphs, yielding models which can effectively be fed with relational data. In this context, vertices in a graph can be projected into a hyperdimensional real space and iteratively refined over many message-passing iterations in an end-to-end differentiable architecture. Architectures of this family have been referred to with several definitions in the literature, such as Graph Neural Networks, Message-passing Neural Networks, Relational Networks and Graph Networks. In this paper, we revisit the original Graph Neural Network model and show that it generalises many of the recent models, which in turn benefit from the insight of thinking about vertex \textbf{types}. To illustrate the generality of the original model, we present a Graph Neural Network formalisation, which partitions the vertices of a graph into a number of types. Each type represents an entity in the ontology of the problem one wants to learn. This allows - for instance - one to assign embeddings to edges, hyperedges, and any number of global attributes of the graph. As a companion to this paper we provide a Python/Tensorflow library to facilitate the development of such architectures, with which we instantiate the formalisation to reproduce a number of models proposed in the current literature.

The application of deep learning to symbolic domains remains an active research endeavour. Graph neural networks (GNN), consisting of trained neural modules which can be arranged in different topologies at run time, are sound alternatives to tackle relational problems which lend themselves to graph representations. In this paper, we show that GNNs are capable of multitask learning, which can be naturally enforced by training the model to refine a single set of multidimensional embeddings $\in \mathbb{R}^d$ and decode them into multiple outputs by connecting MLPs at the end of the pipeline. We demonstrate the multitask learning capability of the model in the relevant relational problem of estimating network centrality measures, i.e. is vertex $v_1$ more central than vertex $v_2$ given centrality $c$?. We then show that a GNN can be trained to develop a $lingua$ $franca$ of vertex embeddings from which all relevant information about any of the trained centrality measures can be decoded. The proposed model achieves $89\%$ accuracy on a test dataset of random instances with up to 128 vertices and is shown to generalise to larger problem sizes. The model is also shown to obtain reasonable accuracy on a dataset of real world instances with up to 4k vertices, vastly surpassing the sizes of the largest instances with which the model was trained ($n=128$). Finally, we believe that our contributions attest to the potential of GNNs in symbolic domains in general and in relational learning in particular.

Graph Neural Networks (GNN) are a promising technique for bridging differential programming and combinatorial domains. GNNs employ trainable modules which can be assembled in different configurations that reflect the relational structure of each problem instance. In this paper, we show that GNNs can learn to solve, with very little supervision, the decision variant of the Traveling Salesperson Problem (TSP), a highly relevant $\mathcal{NP}$-Complete problem. Our model is trained to function as an effective message-passing algorithm in which edges (embedded with their weights) communicate with vertices for a number of iterations after which the model is asked to decide whether a route with cost $