Traffic signal control is crucial for managing congestion in urban networks. Existing myopic pressure-based control methods focus only on immediate upstream links, leading to suboptimal green time allocation and increased network delays. Effective signal control, however, inherently requires a broader spatial scope, as traffic conditions further upstream can significantly impact traffic at the current location. This paper introduces a novel concept based on the Markov chain theory, namely multi-hop upstream pressure, that generalizes the conventional pressure to account for traffic conditions beyond the immediate upstream links. This farsighted and compact metric informs the deep reinforcement learning agent to preemptively clear the present queues, guiding the agent to optimize signal timings with a broader spatial awareness. Simulations on synthetic and realistic (Toronto) scenarios demonstrate controllers utilizing multi-hop upstream pressure significantly reduce overall network delay by prioritizing traffic movements based on a broader understanding of upstream congestion.

Traffic prediction is a spatiotemporal predictive task that plays an essential role in intelligent transportation systems. Today, graph convolutional neural networks (GCNNs) have become the prevailing models in the traffic prediction literature since they excel at extracting spatial correlations. In this work, we classify the components of successful GCNN prediction models and analyze the effects of matrix factorization, attention mechanism, and weight sharing on their performance. Furthermore, we compare these variations against random forests, a traditional regression method that predates GCNNs by over 15 years. We evaluated these methods using simulated data of two regions in Toronto as well as real-world sensor data from selected California highways. We found that incorporating matrix factorization, attention, and location-specific model weights either individually or collectively into GCNNs can result in a better overall performance. Moreover, although random forest regression is a less compact model, it matches or exceeds the performance of all variations of GCNNs in our experiments. This suggests that the current graph convolutional methods may not be the best approach to traffic prediction and there is still room for improvement. Finally, our findings also suggest that for future research on GCNN for traffic prediction to be credible, researchers must include performance comparison to random forests.

Perimeter control maintains high traffic efficiency within protected regions by controlling transfer flows among regions to ensure that their traffic densities are below critical values. Existing approaches can be categorized as either model-based or model-free, depending on whether they rely on network transmission models (NTMs) and macroscopic fundamental diagrams (MFDs). Although model-based approaches are more data efficient and have performance guarantees, they are inherently prone to model bias and inaccuracy. For example, NTMs often become imprecise for a large number of protected regions, and MFDs can exhibit scatter and hysteresis that are not captured in existing model-based works. Moreover, no existing studies have employed reinforcement learning for homogeneous flow rate optimization in microscopic simulation, where spatial characteristics, vehicle-level information, and metering realizations -- often overlooked in macroscopic simulations -- are taken into account. To circumvent issues of model-based approaches and macroscopic simulation, we propose a model-free deep reinforcement learning approach that optimizes the flow rate homogeneously at the perimeter at the microscopic level. Results demonstrate that our model-free reinforcement learning approach without any knowledge of NTMs or MFDs can compete and match the performance of a model-based approach, and exhibits enhanced generalizability and scalability.

Offline reinforcement learning (RL) addresses the problem of learning a performant policy from a fixed batch of data collected by following some behavior policy. Model-based approaches are particularly appealing in the offline setting since they can extract more learning signals from the logged dataset by learning a model of the environment. However, the performance of existing model-based approaches falls short of model-free counterparts, due to the compounding of estimation errors in the learned model. Driven by this observation, we argue that it is critical for a model-based method to understand when to trust the model and when to rely on model-free estimates, and how to act conservatively w.r.t. both. To this end, we derive an elegant and simple methodology called conservative Bayesian model-based value expansion for offline policy optimization (CBOP), that trades off model-free and model-based estimates during the policy evaluation step according to their epistemic uncertainties, and facilitates conservatism by taking a lower bound on the Bayesian posterior value estimate. On the standard D4RL continuous control tasks, we find that our method significantly outperforms previous model-based approaches: e.g., MOPO by $116.4$%, MOReL by $23.2$% and COMBO by $23.7$%. Further, CBOP achieves state-of-the-art performance on $11$ out of $18$ benchmark datasets while doing on par on the remaining datasets.

Recent years have witnessed substantial growth in adaptive traffic signal control (ATSC) methodologies that improve transportation network efficiency, especially in branches leveraging artificial intelligence based optimization and control algorithms such as reinforcement learning as well as conventional model predictive control. However, lack of cross-domain analysis and comparison of the effectiveness of applied methods in ATSC research limits our understanding of existing challenges and research directions. This chapter proposes a novel unified view of modern ATSCs to identify common ground as well as differences and shortcomings of existing methodologies with the ultimate goal to facilitate cross-fertilization and advance the state-of-the-art. The unified view applies the mathematical language of the Markov decision process, describes the process of controller design from both the world (problem) and solution modeling perspectives. The unified view also analyses systematic issues commonly ignored in existing studies and suggests future potential directions to resolve these issues.