Police tech can sidestep facial recognition bans now

Companies like Flock and Axon sell suites of sensors--cameras, license plate readers, gunshot detectors, drones--and then offer AI tools to make sense of that ocean of data (at last year's conference I saw schmoozing between countless AI-for-police startups and the chiefs they sell to on the expo floor). Departments say these technologies save time, ease officer shortages, and help cut down on response times. Those sound like fine goals, but this pace of adoption raises an obvious question: Who makes the rules here? When does the use of AI cross over from efficiency into surveillance, and what type of transparency is owed to the public? In some cases, AI-powered police tech is already driving a wedge between departments and the communities they serve.