A Proofs
–Neural Information Processing Systems
The proof directly follows from Theorem 3.2 from V ergari et al. [75]. Note that O ( |q ||c|) is a loose upperbound and the size of r is in practice smaller [75]. Analogously, the second statement of Theorem 3.1 follows from Proposition A.1 and by recalling For our experiments we use standard compilation tools to obtain a constraint circuit starting from a propositional logical formula in conjunctive normal form. We now illustrate step-by-step one example of such a compilation for a simple logical formula. Deterministic sum units represent disjoint solutions to the logical formula, meaning there exists distinct assignments, characterized by the children, that satisfy the logical constraint e.g.
Neural Information Processing Systems
Nov-16-2025, 00:32:29 GMT
- Technology: