A Proof of Proposition 2.2: additive expansion proposition
–Neural Information Processing Systems
We first define the restricted Cheeger constant in the link prediction task. Then, according to Proposition 2.1, we have: Then, we can draw the same conclusion with Eq.12, and the Thus, Eq.16 can be simplified to: "sites" Based on the Eq.15 and Eq.17, we can rewrite L The inequality holds due to the assumption. Knowledge discovery: In the 5 random experiments, we add 500 pseudo links in each iteration. The metadata information of the nodes are all strongly relevant to "Linux" Both papers focus on the "malware"/"phishing" under the topic "Computer security". The detailed result of the case study is shown in Table 6.
Neural Information Processing Systems
Oct-9-2025, 11:22:27 GMT
- Industry:
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Technology:
- Information Technology
- Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning (0.90)
- Data Science > Data Mining (0.57)
- Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Software (0.96)
- Information Technology