Fair comparison and ablation study

The results on CIFAR10 were listed in Table R1. It reveals that HOGA searched by AutoLA (k=4)) still outperforms SE and CBAM by a large margin. We further customized SE and CBAM using the group split operation (denoted by "HOG"), resulting in a specific The HOGA searched by AutoLA outperforms its randomly search counterparts (denoted by "Rand"). We tested the generalization ability of HOGA searched on ResNet56 (denoted by "AutoLA_56") WiderResNet, indicating the consistent superiority of the HOGA searched by AutoLA over previous attention methods. We also compared AutoLA with SE and CBAM on a larger backbone (e.g., The results in Table R3 suggest that AutoLA still outperforms other attention modules.