Figure R. 1: (a) Geodesic error comparison of ours (unsup.), FMNet [28 ] (sup.) and Halimi et al. [16] (unsup.) on FAUST. (b) One

We thank the reviewers for their comments. All reviewers are positive about our novelty and compelling results . The ground-truth densely aligned shapes are used for evaluation. As shown in Fig. R.1(a), our method, as a Fig. R.1(b) visualizes the estimated correspondences. Our method achieves competitive performance as optimization-based baselines.