Response to reviews of paper 3681 - " Blow: a single-scale hyperconditioned flow for non-1 parallel raw-audio voice conversion "

We are very grateful to all reviewers for their positive assessment of our work and their constructive feedback. We have acted in two ways to improve our work. Spoofing metric, which is 99.3% for the considered data set and split. Finally, one reviewer points out that we should compare to "AUTOVC: Zero-shot V oice Style Transfer with Only