Review for NeurIPS paper: Look-ahead Meta Learning for Continual Learning

Weaknesses: I found some issues with the experiments, that I list in the following: Line 215 states that experiments refer to "task incremental settings". This term has a specific meaning in CL literature [3,4]: it usually means "multihead", i.e. task labels are given at inference time. I understand that this is the setting that is featured in section 5.2. Recent literature [1, 2, 5, 6] argues that this setting is trivial and that the Single-head/Class-Incremental setting (i.e. Providing Class-IL results could therefore be of great help to understand how LA-MAML performs in a more challenging setting.