Review for NeurIPS paper: The Advantage of Conditional Meta-Learning for Biased Regularization and Fine Tuning

Thank you for bringing up the shortcomings of the initial reviewers. I'm disappointed that they did not seem to evaluate the core contributions of the paper, which are theoretical in nature. After the rebuttal, I sought out and found two emergency reviewers to the paper who are better suited to review this paper. The two new reviewers (whose reviews should be visible) both scored the paper above the bar. I generally agree with their assessment, as well as their feedback on the paper.