R1: Comparison with inexact methods Aligning with prior exact papers [10, 18], we focus on comparisons with exact

Neural Information Processing Systems 

We thank all five reviewers for their detailed and incisive feedback. We tested AustereMH [16], an inexact method, on robust linear regression in Section 5.1 with We added this to the Appendix. This does not affect the properties of TunaMH. Our theorem doesn't have this assumption; it suggests that for MHSubLhd with given user-specified The impact is 3-fold: it (1) provides an upper bound on performance for algorithms of Algorithm 1's TunaMH); (3) suggests directions for developing new algorithms. To be significantly faster than TunaMH, we either need more assumptions about the problem or new stateful algorithms.

Similar Docs  Excel Report  more

TitleSimilaritySource
None found