Using Rules

There is little doubt that the decision to use rules to encode infectious disease knowledge in the nascent MYCIN system was largely influenced by our experience using similar techniques in DENDRAL. However, as mentioned in Chapter 1, we did experiment with a semantic network representation before turning to the production rule model. The impressive published examples of Carbonell's SCHOLAR system (Carbonell, 1970a; 1970b), with its ability to carry on a mixed-initiative dialogue regarding the geography of South America, seemed to us a useful model of the kind of rich interactive environment that would be needed for a system to advise physicians. Our disenchantment with a pure semantic network representation of the domain knowledge arose for several reasons as we began to work with Cohen and Axline, our collaborating experts. First, the knowledge of infectious disease therapy selection was ill-structured and, we found, difficult to represent using labeled arcs between nodes. Unlike South American geography, our domain did not have a clear-cut hierarchical organization, and we found it challenging to transfer a page or two from a medical textbook into a network of sufficient richness for our purposes. Of particular importance was our need for a strong inferential mechanism that would allow our system to reason about complex relationships among diverse concepts; there was no precedent for inferences on a semantic net that went beyond the direct, labeled relationships between nodes.1 Perhaps the greatest problem with a network representation, and the greatest appeal of production rules, was our gradually recognized need to deal with small chunks of domain knowledge in interacting with our expert collaborators.