'The modern science of switching theory began

Did you know your Organization can subscribe to the ACM Digital Library?

You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither Project Euclid nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations. Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the Project Euclid website.

This work is partly included in a project sponsored by Statens tekniska forskningsråd (Sweden). Berg, and Mr Voghera for reading the manuscript and making valuable suggestions (see also n. 11). Use the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues.

MIT Press.

Research report RC 294, IBM, Yorktown Heights, New York

In Yovitts, M. and Cameron, S. (eds.) Self-organizing Systems. New York: Pergamon

This paper briefly reviews the evidence for multistore theories of memory and points out some difficulties with the approach. An alternative framework for human memory research is then outlined in terms of depth or levels of processing. Some current data and arguments are reexamined in the light of this alternative framework and implications for further research considered.

Group Report 54-15, Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lexington, Mass

Teddington Conference