Output: deterministic upper-bound for the frequency of z in the data set: ˆfCMSup (z). The CMS-CU algorithm Algorithm A2 CMS-CU Input: Data set Z1,...,Zm. Output: deterministic upper-bound for the frequency of z in the data set: ˆfCMS CUup (z). Input: A (trainable) rule for computing nested intervals [ˆLm,α(; t), ˆUm,α(; t)], t T. Input: Number of data points mtrain0

Training Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBMs) has been challenging for a long time due to the difficulty of computing precisely the log-likelihood gradient. Over the past decades, many works have proposed more or less successful training recipes but without studying the crucial quantity of the problem: the mixing time, i.e. the number of Monte Carlo iterations needed to sample new configurations from a model. In this work, we show that this mixing time plays a crucial role in the dynamics and stability of the trained model, and that RBMs operate in two well-defined regimes, namely equilibrium and out-of-equilibrium, depending on the interplay between this mixing time of the model and the number of steps, k, used to approximate the gradient. We further show empirically that this mixing time increases with the learning, which often implies a transition from one regime to another as soon as kbecomes smaller than this time. In particular, we show that using the popular k (persistent) contrastive divergence approaches, with k small, the dynamics of the learned model are extremely slow and often dominated by strong out-of-equilibrium effects. On the contrary, RBMs trained in equilibrium display faster dynamics, and a smooth convergence to dataset-like configurations during the sampling. Finally we discuss how to exploit in practice both regimes depending on the task one aims to fulfill: (i) short k can be used to generate convincing samples in short learning times, (ii) large k (or increasingly large) is needed to learn the correct equilibrium distribution of the RBM. Finally, the existence of these two operational regimes seems to be a general property of energy based models trained via likelihood maximization.

The input tensor shape is 6 3 3. The corresponding weight matrix has f = 20 rows (one row per filter) and 24 columns (c κ1 κ2), as for the corresponding feature matrix, it has 24 rows and 4 columns, the 4 here is the number of convolution windows (i.e., number of pixels/entries in each of the output feature maps). After multiplying those matrices, we reshape them to the desired shape to obtain the desired output feature maps. In this section, we provide more details pertaining to our method. A.1 Method Preliminaries Our layer-wise compression technique hinges upon the insight that any linear layer may be cast as a matrix multiplication, which enables us to rely on SVD as compression subroutine. Focusing on convolutions we show how such a layer can be recast as matrix multiplication. Similar approaches have been used by Denton et al. (2014); Idelbayev and Carreira-Perpinán (2020); Wen et al. (2017) among others. The equivalence of Y and Y can be easily established via an appropriate reshaping operation since p= p1p2. Equipped with the notion of correspondence between convolution and matrix multiplication our goal is to decompose the layer via its matrix operator W Rf cκ1κ2. To this end, we compute the j-rank approximation of W using SVD and factor it into a pair of smaller matrices U Rf j and V Rj cκ1κ2.

We present a novel global compression framework for deep neural networks that automatically analyzes each layer to identify the optimal per-layer compression ratio, while simultaneously achieving the desired overall compression.

Step 3: Given these S dispersed points T = {t1,t2,...,tS}as the seeds, we assign the neighboring pixels of each seed into the same part according to the Voronoi diagram and correspondingly derive S local parts.

Few-shot segmentation (FSS) aims at performing semantic segmentation on novel classes given a few annotated support samples. With a rethink of recent advances, we find that the current FSS framework has deviated far from the supervised segmentation framework: Given the deep features, FSS methods typically use an intricate decoder to perform sophisticated pixel-wise matching, while the supervised segmentation methods use a simple linear classification head. Due to the intricacy of the decoder and its matching pipeline, it is not easy to follow such an FSS framework. This paper revives the straightforward framework of "feature extractor + linear classification head" and proposes a novel Feature-Proxy Transformer (FPTrans) method, in which the "proxy" is the vector representing a semantic class in the linear classification head. FPTrans has two keypoints for learning discriminative features and representative proxies: 1) To better utilize the limited support samples, the feature extractor makes the query interact with the support features from bottom to top layers using a novel prompting strategy.

The literature for the geometric properties of Riemannian Manifolds is immense and hence we cannot hope to survey them here; for an appetizer, we refer the reader to Burago et al. [93] and Lee [94] and references therein. On the other hand, as stated, it is not until recently that the long-run non-asymptotic behavior of optimization algorithms in Riemannian manifolds (even the smooth ones) has encountered a lot of interest. For concision, we have deferred here a detailed exposition of the rest of recent results to Appendix A of the paper's supplement. Additionally, in Appendix B we also give a bunch of motivating examples which can be solved by Riemannian min-max optimization. Many application problems can be formulated as the minimization or maximization of a smooth function over Riemannian manifold and has triggered a line of research on the extension of the classical first-order and second-order methods to Riemannian setting with asymptotic convergence to first-order stationary points in general [95].