Interpretable text representations should expose coordinates that are not only predictive, but also meaningful enough for independent auditors to apply. Existing discriminative representations often use anonymous embedding directions, while concept-bottleneck and LLM-assisted methods attach natural-language names to features without ensuring that those definitions are reproducible or distinct from the target label. We propose an operational criterion for interpretable discriminative text representations: each coordinate should satisfy conceptual clarity, measured by chance-adjusted agreement between independent annotators applying the feature definition, and label disentanglement, meaning the feature should not merely paraphrase the prediction target. We instantiate this criterion in LLM-assisted Feature Discovery (LFD), an iterative method that proposes lexical and semantic features from contrastive outcome-opposed text pairs, screens candidates using cross-LLM Cohen's $κ$, and selects features by residual held-out predictive gain. A stylized analysis connects the $κ$ screen to a per-feature annotation-noise bound, formalizing agreement as a reliability check. Across ten text-classification tasks spanning seven corpora, LFD matches the predictive performance of a strong text bottleneck baseline while producing substantially clearer and less label-entangled features. Human audits with 232 raters show that LFD features achieve higher human--human and human--LLM agreement than baseline concepts, and raters consistently judge them as less label-leaking. These results suggest that agreement-tested, label-disentangled coordinates provide a practical auditability standard for interpretable text classification.

Preconditioned optimizers are central to language model training, but their stochastic update rules are usually treated as direct approximations to population preconditioned descent. We show that this view misses two finite-sample biases. First, the gradient and preconditioner are typically estimated from the same minibatch, introducing gradient--preconditioner coupling bias. Second, even when the preconditioner estimate is unbiased, its inverse or inverse-root is generally biased because inversion is nonlinear. We propose a single-batch bias-correction framework that addresses both effects: cross-fitted preconditioning estimates the numerator and preconditioner from independent microbatch groups, while variance-corrected inversion uses microbatch variability to subtract the leading delta-method bias term. The framework applies to diagonal moment, diagonal curvature, and matrix preconditioning methods, instantiated in AdamW, Sophia, and Shampoo. Bias correction reduces held-out pretraining loss on Qwen2.5-0.5B by $0.15$, $0.07$, and $0.11$ nats, respectively; the effects on mixed-quality pretraining and downstream instruction tuning are consistently neutral-to-positive. Together, these results establish bias correction as a practical mechanism for reducing finite-sample update bias and improving the performance of preconditioned optimizers.

Communication is a major bottleneck in distributed learning, especially in large-scale settings and in federated learning environments with slow links. Three standard ways to reduce this cost are communication compression, local training, and communication-computation overlap. Methods that combine these ingredients are used in practice and have been found to be effective for large-scale training, but there is little theory for methods that combine all three. We study a heterogeneous-compute setting in which different workers may take different numbers of local steps, and we propose LOSCAR-SGD, a Local SGD method that communicates only a sparse subset of model coordinates and continues optimizing while communication is in flight. A key ingredient is a delay-corrected merge rule that incorporates delayed synchronized information without discarding the progress made during the overlap phase. We give convergence guarantees for smooth non-convex objectives and show how sparsity, overlap, and worker heterogeneity affect the rate. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first theory for this combination of ingredients. Experiments further show that communication-computation overlap reduces training time and that the delay-corrected merge outperforms naive overwriting.

We establish maximal concentration bounds for the iterates generated by stochastic approximation algorithms with general step sizes, where the noise has a finite-state Markovian component plus a Martingale-difference component. When the Martingale-difference noise is bounded, we show that the tail of the error can be sub-Gaussian, sub-Weibull, or something lighter than any Pareto but heavier than any Weibull, depending on the step size sequence and on whether the random operator is almost surely contractive, almost surely non-expansive, or expansive with positive probability. Our analysis relies on a novel Lyapunov function involving the moment-generating function of the solution to a Poisson equation, together with an auxiliary projected algorithm. We complement the upper bounds with worst-case examples showing that qualitatively sharper bounds are impossible. We further study the case of unbounded Martingale-difference noise when the average operator is contractive, and the step sizes are of order $1/k$. In this setting, we show that if the random operator is almost surely non-expansive, then the error tail is at most three times heavier than the noise tail, whereas if the random operator is expansive with positive probability, then the error may have substantially heavier tails. These results are obtained through a novel black-box truncation argument that reduces the unbounded-noise setting to the bounded-noise case.

Gaussian processes (GPs) offer a principled probabilistic model over functions, but exact inference is restricted to the linear-Gaussian regime. We establish an explicit equivalence between GPs and a class of linear diffusion models, recasting predictive sampling as an ODE with closed-form Gaussian dynamics and a likelihood-dependent guidance term that admits a simple Monte Carlo approximation. In the linear-Gaussian setting, we recover standard GP conditioning exactly; beyond conjugacy, the same machinery handles any conditioning statement admitting point-wise likelihood evaluation -- including non-linear physics, and, for the first time, natural language via large language models. Whitening isolates the irreducible non-Gaussian dynamics, minimising Wasserstein-2 transport cost and eliminating numerical stiffness. The result is a general-purpose GP inference scheme requiring no bespoke derivations. Together, these results provide a general mechanism for incorporating the full richness of real-world knowledge as conditioning information, opening a new frontier for the probabilistic modelling of real-world problems.

Accurate and well-calibrated Machine Learning (ML) models are mandatory in high-stakes settings, yet effective multiclass calibration remains challenging: global approaches assume calibration errors are homogeneous across the latent space, while local methods often rely on latent-space dimensionality reduction, which leads to information loss. To address these issues, we propose a compositional approach to multiclass calibration, where region-specific calibration maps are constructed from shared codeword-dependent factors. We instantiate this idea via Vector Quantization (VQ), which induces a structured partition of the representation space, and an indexed parameterization of Dirichlet concentrations that enables parameter sharing across regions. Our approach learns heterogeneous calibration maps that generalize well even to sparse regions of the latent space. Experiments on benchmark datasets show significant improvements in local calibration while maintaining competitive global calibration and predictive performance.

We consider Constrained Online Convex Optimization (COCO) with adversarially chosen constraints. At each round, the learner chooses an action before observing the loss and constraint function for that round. The goal is to achieve small static regret against the best point satisfying all constraints while also controlling cumulative constraint violation ($\mathsf{CCV}$). For strongly convex losses, state-of-the-art algorithms achieve $O(\log T)$ regret and $O(\sqrt{T \log T})$ $\mathsf{CCV}.$ The corresponding best-known bounds for convex losses is $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret and $O(\sqrt{T} \log T)$ $\mathsf{CCV}$. In this paper, we give a simple projection-based algorithm that simultaneously achieves $O(\log T)$ regret and $O(\log T)$ $\mathsf{CCV}$ for strongly-convex losses, yielding an exponential improvement in the $\mathsf{CCV}$. For the convex losses, our algorithm improves the $\mathsf{CCV}$ to $O(\sqrt{T})$ while maintaining the optimal $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret. The key to our improvement is a recent geometric result for self-contracted curves, which may be of independent interest.

One of the most fundamental properties of a machine learning model is its complexity, with applications across topics such as interpretation, generalization, and model selection. Despite its importance, there is no canonical, model-agnostic way to assess a model's complexity. While simple heuristics, such as the number or magnitude of parameters, yield very crude estimates, hyperparameter-based approaches, such as polynomial degree or kernel length scale, do not generalize across model classes. More rigorous methods, including the Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension (VCD) (Vapnik, 2013), Rademacher complexity (RMC) (Bartlett and Mendelson, 2002), and effective number of parameters (or effective degrees of freedom, ENP) (Efron, 1986), are difficult, or even impossible, to compute in practice, leaving the user to resort to crude bounds and/or approximations. The topic is further complicated by the often overlooked distinction between model and function complexity, where the former sets a ceiling on the latter.

Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) has emerged as a powerful tool for parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs). This paper studies LoRA under a federated learning setting, enabling collaborative fine-tuning across clients while preserving parameter efficiency. We focus on a highly heterogeneous regime in which clients share only partial structure and a substantial subset may be contaminated. We propose Collaborative Low-rank Alignment and Identifiable Recovery (CLAIR), a contamination-aware framework that relies only on preliminary local estimators. Its formulation applies broadly, from linear regression to neural network and LLM modules, whenever local adaptation can be represented by matrix-valued updates. CLAIR recovers the shared LoRA subspace and detects contaminated clients via a structured low-rank plus block-sparse decomposition. We prove exact recovery of the shared LoRA subspace in the noiseless case, stable recovery under preliminary estimation error, and consistent collaborative-set recovery under mild separation conditions. We further quantify the gain from CLAIR refinement: it reduces off-subspace estimation error through cross-client averaging while preserving client-specific variation within the shared LoRA subspace, thus improves over local fine-tuning whenever this oracle gain outweighs the costs of subspace estimation and benign-client heterogeneity. Empirically, we demonstrate the benefits of CLAIR by fine-tuning a Transformer architecture on a text-copying task. The results show accurate contamination detection and improved benign-client performance compared with local fine-tuning and non-robust federated averaging.

Compositional score-based approaches to simulation-based inference (SBI) approximate the posterior over a shared parameter given $n$ independent observations by aggregating individually learned posterior scores: currently, there are two main propositions of such methods (Geffner et al. (2023), Linhart et al. (2026)). As the resulting composite score does not correspond to the score of any distribution along the forward diffusion path of the true multi-observation posterior, sampling from it via a reverse SDE leads to an irreducible bias. Annealed Langevin dynamics provides a principled alternative: it treats the composite score as the genuine score of a sequence of tractable bridging densities and samples from them in succession. When properly tuned, it could lead to a controllable bias. However, its hyperparameters, namely step sizes, the number of steps per level, and the number of annealing levels, have so far been chosen empirically. We derive Wasserstein bounds for annealed Langevin with approximate scores and translate them into explicit decision rules for these hyperparameters that guarantee a prescribed sampling accuracy, while highlighting different theoretical aspects of each composite score formulation. In the Gaussian setting, we obtain closed-form expressions for all relevant quantities and prove that the bridging densities of Linhart et al. (2026) consistently admit larger step sizes and require fewer total Langevin steps than those of Geffner et al. (2023). Furthermore, we show empirically that the tuning obtained in the Gaussian setting generalizes to more complex problems, thus providing a well-understood and theoretically grounded starting point for practitioners using compositional score-based approaches.