Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Uncertainty




A Phase Space Approach to Minimax Entropy Learning and the Minutemax Approximations

Neural Information Processing Systems

There has been much recent work on measuring image statistics and on learning probability distributions on images. We observe that the mapping from images to statistics is many-to-one and show it can be quantified by a phase space factor. This phase space approach throws light on the Minimax Entropy technique for learning Gibbs distributions on images with potentials derived from image statistics and elucidates the ambiguities that are inherent to determining the potentials. In addition, it shows that if the phase factor can be approximated by an analytic distribution then this approximation yields a swift "Minutemax" algorithm that vastly reduces the computation time for Minimax entropy learning. An illustration of this concept, using a Gaussian to approximate the phase factor, gives a good approximation to the results of Zhu and Mumford (1997) in just seconds of CPU time. The phase space approach also gives insight into the multi-scale potentials found by Zhu and Mumford (1997) and suggests that the forms of the potentials are influenced greatly by phase space considerations. Finally, we prove that probability distributions learned in feature space alone are equivalent to Minimax Entropy learning with a multinomial approximation of the phase factor. 1 Introduction Bayesian probability theory gives a powerful framework for visual perception (Knill and Richards 1996). This approach, however, requires specifying prior probabilities and likelihood functions. Learning these probabilities is difficult because it requires estimating distributions on random variables of very high dimensions (for example, images with 200 x 200 pixels, or shape curves of length 400 pixels).


Probabilistic Visualisation of High-Dimensional Binary Data

Neural Information Processing Systems

We present a probabilistic latent-variable framework for data visualisation, akey feature of which is its applicability to binary and categorical data types for which few established methods exist. A variational approximation to the likelihood is exploited to derive a fast algorithm for determining the model parameters. Illustrations of application to real and synthetic binary data sets are given.


Probabilistic Image Sensor Fusion

Neural Information Processing Systems

We present a probabilistic method for fusion of images produced by multiple sensors. The approach is based on an image formation model in which the sensor images are noisy, locally linear functions of an underlying, true scene. A Bayesian framework then provides for maximum likelihood or maximum a posteriori estimates of the true scene from the sensor images. Maximum likelihood estimates of the parameters of the image formation model involve (local) second order image statistics, and thus are related to local principal component analysis. We demonstrate the efficacy of the method on images from visible-band and infrared sensors. 1 Introduction Advances in sensing devices have fueled the deployment of multiple sensors in several computational vision systems [1, for example]. Using multiple sensors can increase reliability with respect to single sensor systems.


Bayesian Modeling of Facial Similarity

Neural Information Processing Systems

In previous work [6, 9, 10], we advanced a new technique for direct visual matching of images for the purposes of face recognition and image retrieval, using a probabilistic measure of similarity based primarily on a Bayesian (MAP) analysis of image differences, leadingto a "dual" basis similar to eigenfaces [13]. The performance advantage of this probabilistic matching technique over standard Euclidean nearest-neighbor eigenface matching was recently demonstrated using results from DARPA's 1996 "FERET" face recognition competition, in which this probabilistic matching algorithm was found to be the top performer. We have further developed a simple method of replacing the costly compution of nonlinear (online) Bayesian similarity measures by the relatively inexpensive computation of linear (offline) subspace projections and simple (online) Euclidean norms, thus resulting in a significant computational speedup for implementation with very large image databases as typically encountered in real-world applications.


Batch and On-Line Parameter Estimation of Gaussian Mixtures Based on the Joint Entropy

Neural Information Processing Systems

We describe a new iterative method for parameter estimation of Gaussian mixtures.The new method is based on a framework developed by Kivinen and Warmuth for supervised online learning. In contrast to gradient descentand EM, which estimate the mixture's covariance matrices, the proposed method estimates the inverses of the covariance matrices. Furthennore, the new parameter estimation procedure can be applied in both online and batch settings. We show experimentally that it is typically fasterthan EM, and usually requires about half as many iterations as EM. 1 Introduction Mixture models, in particular mixtures of Gaussians, have been a popular tool for density estimation, clustering, and unsupervised learning with a wide range of applications (see for instance [5, 2] and the references therein). Mixture models are one of the most useful tools for handling incomplete data, in particular hidden variables.


Graphical Models for Recognizing Human Interactions

Neural Information Processing Systems

We describe a real-time computer vision and machine learning system for modeling and recognizing human behaviors in two different scenarios: (1) complex, twohanded actionrecognition in the martial art of Tai Chi and (2) detection and recognition of individual human behaviors and multiple-person interactions in a visual surveillance task. In the latter case, the system is particularly concerned with detecting when interactions between people occur, and classifying them. Graphical models, such as Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) [6] and Coupled Hidden MarkovModels (CHMMs) [3, 2], seem appropriate for modeling and, classifying human behaviors because they offer dynamic time warping, a well-understood training algorithm, and a clear Bayesian semantics for both individual (HMMs) and interacting or coupled (CHMMs) generative processes. A major problem with this data-driven statistical approach, especially when modeling rare or anomalous behaviors, is the limited number of training examples. A major emphasis of our work, therefore, is on efficient Bayesian integration of both prior knowledge with evidence from data.


Bayesian Modeling of Human Concept Learning

Neural Information Processing Systems

I consider the problem of learning concepts from small numbers of positive examples,a feat which humans perform routinely but which computers arerarely capable of. Bridging machine learning and cognitive science perspectives, I present both theoretical analysis and an empirical study with human subjects for the simple task oflearning concepts corresponding toaxis-aligned rectangles in a multidimensional feature space. Existing learning models, when applied to this task, cannot explain how subjects generalize from only a few examples of the concept. I propose a principled Bayesian model based on the assumption that the examples are a random sample from the concept to be learned. The model gives precise fits to human behavior on this simple task and provides qualitati ve insights into more complex, realistic cases of concept learning.


Mean Field Methods for Classification with Gaussian Processes

Neural Information Processing Systems

We discuss the application of TAP mean field methods known from the Statistical Mechanics of disordered systems to Bayesian classification modelswith Gaussian processes. In contrast to previous approaches, noknowledge about the distribution of inputs is needed. Simulation results for the Sonar data set are given. They have been recently introduced into the Neural Computation community (Neal 1996, Williams & Rasmussen 1996, Mackay 1997). If we assume fields with zero prior mean, the statistics of h is entirely defined by the second order correlations C(s, S') E[h(s)h(S')], where E denotes expectations 310 MOpper and 0. Winther with respect to the prior. Interesting examples are C(s, s') (1) C(s, s') (2) The choice (1) can be motivated as a limit of a two-layered neural network with infinitely many hidden units with factorizable input-hidden weight priors (Williams 1997).