Recently, data mining studies are being successfully conducted to estimate several parameters in a variety of domains. Data mining techniques have attracted the attention of the information industry and society as a whole, due to a large amount of data and the imminent need to turn it into useful knowledge. However, the effective use of data in some areas is still under development, as is the case in sports, which in recent years, has presented a slight growth; consequently, many sports organizations have begun to see that there is a wealth of unexplored knowledge in the data extracted by them. Therefore, this article presents a systematic review of sports data mining. Regarding years 2010 to 2018, 31 types of research were found in this topic. Based on these studies, we present the current panorama, themes, the database used, proposals, algorithms, and research opportunities. Our findings provide a better understanding of the sports data mining potentials, besides motivating the scientific community to explore this timely and interesting topic.

When the cost of misclassifying a sample is high, it is useful to have an accurate estimate of uncertainty in the prediction for that sample. There are also multiple types of uncertainty which are best estimated in different ways, for example, uncertainty that is intrinsic to the training set may be well-handled by a Bayesian approach, while uncertainty introduced by shifts between training and query distributions may be better-addressed by density/support estimation. In this paper, we examine three types of uncertainty: model capacity uncertainty, intrinsic data uncertainty, and open set uncertainty, and review techniques that have been derived to address each one. We then introduce a unified hierarchical model, which combines methods from Bayesian inference, invertible latent density inference, and discriminative classification in a single end-to-end deep neural network topology to yield efficient per-sample uncertainty estimation.

In a modern observational study based on healthcare databases, the number of observations typically ranges in the order of 10^5 ~ 10^6 and that of the predictors in the order of 10^4 ~ 10^5. Despite the large sample size, data rarely provide sufficient information to reliably estimate such a large number of parameters. Sparse regression provides a potential solution. There is a rich literature on desirable theoretical properties of Bayesian approaches based on shrinkage priors. On the other hand, the development of scalable methods for the required posterior computation has largely been limited to the p >> n case. Shrinkage priors make the posterior amenable to Gibbs sampling, but a major computational bottleneck arises from the need to sample from a high-dimensional Gaussian distribution at each iteration. Despite a closed-form expression for the precision matrix $\Phi$, computing and factorizing such a large matrix is computationally expensive nonetheless. In this article, we present a novel algorithm to speed up this bottleneck based on the following observation: we can cheaply generate a random vector $b$ such that the solution to the linear system $\Phi \beta = b$ has the desired Gaussian distribution. We can then solve the linear system by the conjugate gradient (CG) algorithm through the matrix-vector multiplications by $\Phi$, without ever explicitly inverting $\Phi$. Practical performance of CG, however, depends critically on appropriate preconditioning of the linear system; we turn CG into an effective algorithm for sparse Bayesian regression by developing a theory of prior-preconditioning. We apply our algorithm to a large-scale observational study with n = 72,489 and p = 22,175, designed to assess the relative risk of intracranial hemorrhage from two alternative blood anti-coagulants. Our algorithm demonstrates an order of magnitude speed-up in the posterior computation.

Quantum Graphical Models (QGMs) generalize classical graphical models by adopting the formalism for reasoning about uncertainty from quantum mechanics. Unlike classical graphical models, QGMs represent uncertainty with density matrices in complex Hilbert spaces. Hilbert space embeddings (HSEs) also generalize Bayesian inference in Hilbert spaces. We investigate the link between QGMs and HSEs and show that the sum rule and Bayes rule for QGMs are equivalent to the kernel sum rule in HSEs and a special case of Nadaraya-Watson kernel regression, respectively. We show that these operations can be kernelized, and use these insights to propose a Hilbert Space Embedding of Hidden Quantum Markov Models (HSE-HQMM) to model dynamics. We present experimental results showing that HSE-HQMMs are competitive with state-of-the-art models like LSTMs and PSRNNs on several datasets, while also providing a nonparametric method for maintaining a probability distribution over continuous-valued features.

Gaussian Processes (GPs) are a generic modelling tool for supervised learning. While they have been successfully applied on large datasets, their use in safety-critical applications is hindered by the lack of good performance guarantees. To this end, we propose a method to learn GPs and their sparse approximations by directly optimizing a PAC-Bayesian bound on their generalization performance, instead of maximizing the marginal likelihood. Besides its theoretical appeal, we find in our evaluation that our learning method is robust and yields significantly better generalization guarantees than other common GP approaches on several regression benchmark datasets.

Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) methods can be used to sample from posterior distributions when the likelihood function is unavailable or intractable, as is often the case in biological systems. Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) methods have been combined with ABC to improve efficiency, however these approaches require many simulations from the likelihood. We propose a classification approach within a population Monte Carlo (PMC) framework, where model class probabilities are used to update the particle weights. Our proposed approach outperforms state-of-the-art ratio estimation methods while retaining the automatic selection of summary statistics, and performs competitively with SMC ABC.

Bayesian calibration of black-box computer models offers an established framework to obtain a posterior distribution over model parameters. Traditional Bayesian calibration involves the emulation of the computer model and an additive model discrepancy term using Gaussian processes; inference is then carried out using MCMC. These choices pose computational and statistical challenges and limitations, which we overcome by proposing the use of approximate Deep Gaussian processes and variational inference techniques. The result is a practical and scalable framework for calibration, which obtains competitive performance compared to the state-of-the-art.

Mixture of Experts (MoE) are successful models for modeling heterogeneous data in many statistical learning problems including regression, clustering and classification. Generally fitted by maximum likelihood estimation via the well-known EM algorithm, their application to high-dimensional problems is still therefore challenging. We consider the problem of fitting and feature selection in MoE models, and propose a regularized maximum likelihood estimation approach that encourages sparse solutions for heterogeneous regression data models with potentially high-dimensional predictors. Unlike state-of-the art regularized MLE for MoE, the proposed modelings do not require an approximate of the penalty function. We develop two hybrid EM algorithms: an Expectation-Majorization-Maximization (EM/MM) algorithm, and an EM algorithm with coordinate ascent algorithm. The proposed algorithms allow to automatically obtaining sparse solutions without thresholding, and avoid matrix inversion by allowing univariate parameter updates. An experimental study shows the good performance of the algorithms in terms of recovering the actual sparse solutions, parameter estimation, and clustering of heterogeneous regression data.

Daniel Kahneman was awarded the Nobel Prize in Economic Science in 2002 for his pioneering studies on the identification and estimation of the psychological factors that influence human behaviour under uncertainty, which led to the birth of a new domain called behavioural economics. Cognitive psychologists have assumed for years, often implicitly, that complex cognitive processes, like human judgement and decision-making (DM), have to be modelled by combining set-theoretic structures and should obey to mathematical relations that resemble those typically used in logic, formalized by Boole (Boolean logic), and probability, axiomatized by Kolmogorov (Kolmogorovian probability) [1]. These structures are known in physics as classical structures: they were originally used in classical physics, and later extended to statistics, psychology, economics, finance and computer science. Classical structures are also implicitly assumed in the so-called Bayesian approach, according to which any source of uncertainty can be formalized probabilistically, while people update knowledge according to the Bayes law of Kolmogorovian probability. Finally, classical structures are the building blocks of subjective expected utility theory (SEUT), providing both the descriptive and the normative foundations of rational DM: in situations of uncertainty, people (should) choose as if they maximized EU with respect to a unique probability measure, satisfying the axioms of Kolmogorov and interpreted as their subjective probability [2, 3]. However, on the one side, empirical research in cognitive psychology has revealed that classical structures are not generally able to model human judgements and decisions, thus making problematical the 1 interpretation of a wide range of cognitive phenomena in terms of standard logic and probability theory. On the other side, Kahneman, Tversky and other authors suggested that these empirical deviations from classicality are "true errors" of human reasoning, whence the use of terms like "effect", "fallacy", "paradox", "contradiction", etc., to refer to such phenomena [4, 5].

Usually considered as a classification problem, entity resolution can be very challenging on real data due to the prevalence of dirty values. The state-of-the-art solutions for ER were built on a variety of learning models (most notably deep neural networks), which require lots of accurately labeled training data. Unfortunately, high-quality labeled data usually require expensive manual work, and are therefore not readily available in many real scenarios. In this paper, we propose a novel learning paradigm for ER, called gradual machine learning, which aims to enable effective machine learning without the requirement for manual labeling effort. It begins with some easy instances in a task, which can be automatically labeled by the machine with high accuracy, and then gradually labels more challenging instances based on iterative factor graph inference. In gradual machine learning, the hard instances in a task are gradually labeled in small stages based on the estimated evidential certainty provided by the labeled easier instances. Our extensive experiments on real data have shown that the proposed approach performs considerably better than its unsupervised alternatives, and it is highly competitive with the state-of-the-art supervised techniques. Using ER as a test case, we demonstrate that gradual machine learning is a promising paradigm potentially applicable to other challenging classification tasks requiring extensive labeling effort.