Uncertainty
Scaling Integer Arithmetic in Probabilistic Programs
Cao, William X., Garg, Poorva, Tjoa, Ryan, Holtzen, Steven, Millstein, Todd, Broeck, Guy Van den
These approximate inference strategies can scale well in many cases, but they Distributions on integers are ubiquitous in probabilistic struggle to find valid sampling regions in the presence of modeling but remain challenging for many low-probability observations and non-differentiability (e.g., of today's probabilistic programming languages observing the sum of two large random integers to be a (PPLs). The core challenge comes from discrete constant) [Gelman et al., 2015, Bingham et al., 2019, Dillon structure: many of today's PPL inference strategies et al., 2017]. Exact inference strategies work by preserving rely on enumeration, sampling, or differentiation the global structure of the distribution, but here there is a in order to scale, which fail for high-dimensional challenge: what is the right strategy for efficiently representing complex discrete distributions involving integers.
Implicitly Normalized Explicitly Regularized Density Estimation
Kozdoba, Mark, Perets, Binyamin, Mannor, Shie
We propose a new approach to non-parametric density estimation, that is based on regularizing a Sobolev norm of the density. This method is provably different from Kernel Density Estimation, and makes the bias of the model clear and interpretable. While there is no closed analytic form for the associated kernel, we show that one can approximate it using sampling. The optimization problem needed to determine the density is non-convex, and standard gradient methods do not perform well. However, we show that with an appropriate initialization and using natural gradients, one can obtain well performing solutions. Finally, while the approach provides unnormalized densities, which prevents the use of log-likelihood for cross validation, we show that one can instead adapt Fisher Divergence based Score Matching methods for this task. We evaluate the resulting method on the comprehensive recent Anomaly Detection benchmark suite, ADBench, and find that it ranks second best, among more than 15 algorithms.
Solution Path of Time-varying Markov Random Fields with Discrete Regularization
We study the problem of inferring sparse time-varying Markov random fields (MRFs) with different discrete and temporal regularizations on the parameters. Due to the intractability of discrete regularization, most approaches for solving this problem rely on the so-called maximum-likelihood estimation (MLE) with relaxed regularization, which neither results in ideal statistical properties nor scale to the dimensions encountered in realistic settings. In this paper, we address these challenges by departing from the MLE paradigm and resorting to a new class of constrained optimization problems with exact, discrete regularization to promote sparsity in the estimated parameters. Despite the nonconvex and discrete nature of our formulation, we show that it can be solved efficiently and parametrically for all sparsity levels. More specifically, we show that the entire solution path of the time-varying MRF for all sparsity levels can be obtained in $\mathcal{O}(pT^3)$, where $T$ is the number of time steps and $p$ is the number of unknown parameters at any given time. The efficient and parametric characterization of the solution path renders our approach highly suitable for cross-validation, where parameter estimation is required for varying regularization values. Despite its simplicity and efficiency, we show that our proposed approach achieves provably small estimation error for different classes of time-varying MRFs, namely Gaussian and discrete MRFs, with as few as one sample per time. Utilizing our algorithm, we can recover the complete solution path for instances of time-varying MRFs featuring over 30 million variables in less than 12 minutes on a standard laptop computer. Our code is available at \url{https://sites.google.com/usc.edu/gomez/data}.
Monotonicity and Double Descent in Uncertainty Estimation with Gaussian Processes
Hodgkinson, Liam, van der Heide, Chris, Roosta, Fred, Mahoney, Michael W.
Despite their importance for assessing reliability of predictions, uncertainty quantification (UQ) measures for machine learning models have only recently begun to be rigorously characterized. One prominent issue is the curse of dimensionality: it is commonly believed that the marginal likelihood should be reminiscent of cross-validation metrics and that both should deteriorate with larger input dimensions. We prove that by tuning hyperparameters to maximize marginal likelihood (the empirical Bayes procedure), the performance, as measured by the marginal likelihood, improves monotonically} with the input dimension. On the other hand, we prove that cross-validation metrics exhibit qualitatively different behavior that is characteristic of double descent. Cold posteriors, which have recently attracted interest due to their improved performance in certain settings, appear to exacerbate these phenomena. We verify empirically that our results hold for real data, beyond our considered assumptions, and we explore consequences involving synthetic covariates.
Continuous Time Evidential Distributions for Irregular Time Series
Killian, Taylor W., Zhang, Haoran, Hartvigsen, Thomas, Amini, Ava P.
Prevalent in many real-world settings such as healthcare, irregular time series are challenging to formulate predictions from. It is difficult to infer the value of a feature at any given time when observations are sporadic, as it could take on a range of values depending on when it was last observed. To characterize this uncertainty we present EDICT, a strategy that learns an evidential distribution over irregular time series in continuous time. This distribution enables well-calibrated and flexible inference of partially observed features at any time of interest, while expanding uncertainty temporally for sparse, irregular observations. We demonstrate that EDICT attains competitive performance on challenging time series classification tasks and enabling uncertainty-guided inference when encountering noisy data.
K-VIL: Keypoints-based Visual Imitation Learning
Gao, Jianfeng, Tao, Zhi, Jaquier, Noémie, Asfour, Tamim
Visual imitation learning provides efficient and intuitive solutions for robotic systems to acquire novel manipulation skills. However, simultaneously learning geometric task constraints and control policies from visual inputs alone remains a challenging problem. In this paper, we propose an approach for keypoint-based visual imitation (K-VIL) that automatically extracts sparse, object-centric, and embodiment-independent task representations from a small number of human demonstration videos. The task representation is composed of keypoint-based geometric constraints on principal manifolds, their associated local frames, and the movement primitives that are then needed for the task execution. Our approach is capable of extracting such task representations from a single demonstration video, and of incrementally updating them when new demonstrations become available. To reproduce manipulation skills using the learned set of prioritized geometric constraints in novel scenes, we introduce a novel keypoint-based admittance controller. We evaluate our approach in several real-world applications, showcasing its ability to deal with cluttered scenes, viewpoint mismatch, new instances of categorical objects, and large object pose and shape variations, as well as its efficiency and robustness in both one-shot and few-shot imitation learning settings. Videos and source code are available at https://sites.google.com/view/k-vil.
A Nonparametric Approach with Marginals for Modeling Consumer Choice
Ruan, Yanqiu, Li, Xiaobo, Murthy, Karthyek, Natarajan, Karthik
Given data on the choices made by consumers for different offer sets, a key challenge is to develop parsimonious models that describe and predict consumer choice behavior while being amenable to prescriptive tasks such as pricing and assortment optimization. The marginal distribution model (MDM) is one such model, that requires only the specification of marginal distributions of the random utilities. This paper aims to establish necessary and sufficient conditions for given choice data to be consistent with the MDM hypothesis, inspired by the utility of similar characterizations for the random utility model (RUM). This endeavor leads to an exact characterization of the set of choice probabilities that the MDM can represent. Verifying the consistency of choice data with this characterization is equivalent to solving a polynomial-sized linear program. Since the analogous verification task for RUM is computationally intractable and neither of these models subsumes the other, MDM is helpful in striking a balance between tractability and representational power. The characterization is convenient to be used with robust optimization for making data-driven sales and revenue predictions for new unseen assortments. When the choice data lacks consistency with the MDM hypothesis, finding the best-fitting MDM choice probabilities reduces to solving a mixed integer convex program. The results extend naturally to the case where the alternatives can be grouped based on the similarity of the marginal distributions of the utilities. Numerical experiments show that MDM provides better representational power and prediction accuracy than multinominal logit and significantly better computational performance than RUM.
A Primer on the Data Cleaning Pipeline
The availability of both structured and unstructured databases, such as electronic health data, social media data, patent data, and surveys that are often updated in real time, among others, has grown rapidly over the past decade. With this expansion, the statistical and methodological questions around data integration, or rather merging multiple data sources, has also grown. Specifically, the science of the "data cleaning pipeline" contains four stages that allow an analyst to perform downstream tasks, predictive analyses, or statistical analyses on "cleaned data." This article provides a review of this emerging field, introducing technical terminology and commonly used methods. Statement of Significance: The article reviews the data cleaning pipeline, introducing technical terminology and commonly used methods.
A Statistical View of Column Subset Selection
We consider the problem of selecting a small subset of representative variables from a large dataset. In the computer science literature, this dimensionality reduction problem is typically formalized as Column Subset Selection (CSS). Meanwhile, the typical statistical formalization is to find an information-maximizing set of Principal Variables. This paper shows that these two approaches are equivalent, and moreover, both can be viewed as maximum likelihood estimation within a certain semi-parametric model. Using these connections, we show how to efficiently (1) perform CSS using only summary statistics from the original dataset; (2) perform CSS in the presence of missing and/or censored data; and (3) select the subset size for CSS in a hypothesis testing framework.
Multifidelity Covariance Estimation via Regression on the Manifold of Symmetric Positive Definite Matrices
Maurais, Aimee, Alsup, Terrence, Peherstorfer, Benjamin, Marzouk, Youssef
We introduce a multifidelity estimator of covariance matrices formulated as the solution to a regression problem on the manifold of symmetric positive definite matrices. The estimator is positive definite by construction, and the Mahalanobis distance minimized to obtain it possesses properties which enable practical computation. We show that our manifold regression multifidelity (MRMF) covariance estimator is a maximum likelihood estimator under a certain error model on manifold tangent space. More broadly, we show that our Riemannian regression framework encompasses existing multifidelity covariance estimators constructed from control variates. We demonstrate via numerical examples that our estimator can provide significant decreases, up to one order of magnitude, in squared estimation error relative to both single-fidelity and other multifidelity covariance estimators. Furthermore, preservation of positive definiteness ensures that our estimator is compatible with downstream tasks, such as data assimilation and metric learning, in which this property is essential.