Bayesian Inference
Robustness Against Outliers For Deep Neural Networks By Gradient Conjugate Priors
Gurevich, Pavel, Stuke, Hannes
We analyze a new robust method for the reconstruction of probability distributions of observed data in the presence of output outliers. It is based on a so-called gradient conjugate prior (GCP) network which outputs the parameters of a prior. By rigorously studying the dynamics of the GCP learning process, we derive an explicit formula for correcting the obtained variance of the marginal distribution and removing the bias caused by outliers in the training set. Assuming a Gaussian (input-dependent) ground truth distribution contaminated with a proportion $\varepsilon$ of outliers, we show that the fitted mean is in a $c e^{-1/\varepsilon}$-neighborhood of the ground truth mean and the corrected variance is in a $b\varepsilon$-neighborhood of the ground truth variance, whereas the uncorrected variance of the marginal distribution can even be infinite. We explicitly find $b$ as a function of the output of the GCP network, without a priori knowledge of the outliers (possibly input-dependent) distribution. Experiments with synthetic and real-world data sets indicate that the GCP network fitted with a standard optimizer outperforms other robust methods for regression.
Unsupervised Linear and Nonlinear Channel Equalization and Decoding using Variational Autoencoders
Caciularu, Avi, Burshtein, David
A new approach for blind channel equalization and decoding, using variational autoencoders (VAEs), is introduced. We first consider the reconstruction of uncoded data symbols transmitted over a noisy linear intersymbol interference (ISI) channel, with an unknown impulse response, without using pilot symbols. We derive an approximated maximum likelihood estimate to the channel parameters and reconstruct the transmitted data. We demonstrate significant and consistent improvements in the error rate of the reconstructed symbols, compared to existing blind equalization methods such as constant modulus, thus enabling faster channel acquisition. The VAE equalizer uses a fully convolutional neural network with a small number of free parameters. These results are extended to blind equalization over a noisy nonlinear ISI channel with unknown parameters. We then consider coded communication using low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes transmitted over a noisy linear or nonlinear ISI channel. The goal is to reconstruct the transmitted message from the channel observations corresponding to a transmitted codeword, without using pilot symbols. We demonstrate substantial improvements compared to expectation maximization (EM) using turbo equalization. Furthermore, in our simulations we demonstrate a relatively small gap between the performance of the new unsupervised equalization method and that of the fully channel informed (non-blind) turbo equalizer.
Conditional Sum-Product Networks: Imposing Structure on Deep Probabilistic Architectures
Shao, Xiaoting, Molina, Alejandro, Vergari, Antonio, Stelzner, Karl, Peharz, Robert, Liebig, Thomas, Kersting, Kristian
Bayesian networks are a central tool in machine learning and artificial intelligence, and make use of conditional independencies to impose structure on joint distributions. However, they are generally not as expressive as deep learning models and inference is hard and slow. In contrast, deep probabilistic models such as sum-product networks (SPNs) capture joint distributions in a tractable fashion, but use little interpretable structure. Here, we extend the notion of SPNs towards conditional distributions, which combine simple conditional models into high-dimensional ones. As shown in our experiments, the resulting conditional SPNs can be naturally used to impose structure on deep probabilistic models, allow for mixed data types, while maintaining fast and efficient inference.
Posterior Probability
In statistics, the posterior probability expresses how likely a hypothesis is given a particular set of data. This contrasts with the likelihood function, which is represented as P(D H). This distinction is more of an interpretation rather than a mathematical property as both have the form of conditional probability. In order to calculate the posterior probability, we use Bayes theorem, which is discussed below. Bayes theorem, which is the probability of a hypothesis given some prior observable data, relies on the use of likelihood P(D H) alongside the prior P(H) and marginal likelihood P(D) in order to calculate the posterior P(H D).
Leveraging Bayesian Analysis To Improve Accuracy of Approximate Models
Nadiga, Balasubramanya T., Jiang, Chiyu, Livescu, Daniel
We focus on improving the accuracy of an approximate model of a multiscale dynamical system that uses a set of parameter-dependent terms to account for the effects of unresolved or neglected dynamics on resolved scales. We start by considering various methods of calibrating and analyzing such a model given a few well-resolved simulations. After presenting results for various point estimates and discussing some of their shortcomings, we demonstrate (a) the potential of hierarchical Bayesian analysis to uncover previously unanticipated physical dependencies in the approximate model, and (b) how such insights can then be used to improve the model. In effect parametric dependencies found from the Bayesian analysis are used to improve structural aspects of the model. While we choose to illustrate the procedure in the context of a closure model for buoyancy-driven, variable-density turbulence, the statistical nature of the approach makes it more generally applicable. Towards addressing issues of increased computational cost associated with the procedure, we demonstrate the use of a neural network based surrogate in accelerating the posterior sampling process and point to recent developments in variational inference as an alternative methodology for greatly mitigating such costs. We conclude by suggesting that modern validation and uncertainty quantification techniques such as the ones we consider have a valuable role to play in the development and improvement of approximate models.
A Bayesian Approach to Robust Reinforcement Learning
Derman, Esther, Mankowitz, Daniel, Mann, Timothy, Mannor, Shie
Robust Markov Decision Processes (RMDPs) intend to ensure robustness with respect to changing or adversarial system behavior. In this framework, transitions are modeled as arbitrary elements of a known and properly structured uncertainty set and a robust optimal policy can be derived under the worst-case scenario. In this study, we address the issue of learning in RMDPs using a Bayesian approach. We introduce the Uncertainty Robust Bellman Equation (URBE) which encourages safe exploration for adapting the uncertainty set to new observations while preserving robustness. We propose a URBE-based algorithm, DQN-URBE, that scales this method to higher dimensional domains. Our experiments show that the derived URBE-based strategy leads to a better trade-off between less conservative solutions and robustness in the presence of model misspecification. In addition, we show that the DQN-URBE algorithm can adapt significantly faster to changing dynamics online compared to existing robust techniques with fixed uncertainty sets.
Recommendation from Raw Data with Adaptive Compound Poisson Factorization
Gouvert, Olivier, Oberlin, Thomas, Fรฉvotte, Cรฉdric
Count data are often used in recommender systems: they are widespread (song play counts, product purchases, clicks on web pages) and can reveal user preference without any explicit rating from the user. Such data are known to be sparse, over-dispersed and bursty, which makes their direct use in recommender systems challenging, often leading to pre-processing steps such as binarization. The aim of this paper is to build recommender systems from these raw data, by means of the recently proposed compound Poisson Factorization (cPF). The paper contributions are three-fold: we present a unified framework for discrete data (dcPF), leading to an adaptive and scalable algorithm; we show that our framework achieves a trade-off between Poisson Factorization (PF) applied to raw and binarized data; we study four specific instances that are relevant to recommendation and exhibit new links with combinatorics. Experiments with three different datasets show that dcPF is able to effectively adjust to over-dispersion, leading to better recommendation scores when compared with PF on either raw or binarized data.
Time-varying Autoregression with Low Rank Tensors
Harris, Kameron Decker, Aravkin, Aleksandr, Rao, Rajesh, Brunton, Bingni Wen
We present a windowed technique to learn parsimonious time-varying autoregressive models from multivariate timeseries. This unsupervised method uncovers spatiotemporal structure in data via non-smooth and non-convex optimization. In each time window, we assume the data follow a linear model parameterized by a potentially different system matrix, and we model this stack of system matrices as a low rank tensor. Because of its structure, the model is scalable to high-dimensional data and can easily incorporate priors such as smoothness over time. We find the components of the tensor using alternating minimization and prove that any stationary point of this algorithm is a local minimum. In a test case, our method identifies the true rank of a switching linear system in the presence of noise. We illustrate our model's utility and superior scalability over extant methods when applied to several synthetic and real examples, including a nonlinear dynamical system, worm behavior, sea surface temperature, and monkey brain recordings.
PAC-Bayes under potentially heavy tails
Subsequent work developed finite-sample risk bounds for "Bayesian" learning algorithms which specify a distribution over the model [14]. These bounds are controlled using the empirical risk and the relative entropy between "prior" and "posterior" distributions, and hold uniformly over the choice of the latter, meaning that the guarantees hold for data-dependent posteriors, hence the naming. Furthermore, choosing the posterior to minimize PAC-Bayesian risk bounds leads to practical learning algorithms which have seen numerous successful applications [3]. Following this framework, a tremendous amount of work has been done to refine, extend, and apply the PAC-Bayesian framework to new learning problems. Tight risk bounds for bounded losses are due to Seeger [16] and Maurer [12], with the former work applying them to Gaussian processes.
Gradient tree boosting with random output projections for multi-label classification and multi-output regression
Joly, Arnaud, Wehenkel, Louis, Geurts, Pierre
Multi-output supervised learning aims to model input-output relationships from observations of inputoutput pairs whenever the output space is a vector of random variables. Multi-output classification and regression tasks have numerous applications in domains ranging from biology to multimedia, and recent applications in this area correspond to very high dimensional output spaces (Agrawal et al, 2013; Dekel and Shamir, 2010). Classification and regression trees (Breiman et al, 1984) are popular supervised learning methods that provide state-of-the-art performance when exploited in the context of ensemble methods, namely Random forests (Breiman, 2001; Geurts et al, 2006) and Boosting (Freund and Schapire, 1997; Friedman, 2001). Classification and regression trees can obviously be exploited to handle multi-output problems. The most straightforward way to address multi-output tasks is to apply standard single output methods separately and independently on each output. Although simple, this method, called binary relevance (Tsoumakas et al, 2009) in multi-label classification or single target (Spyromitros-Xioufis et al, 2012) in multi-output regression is often suboptimal as it does not exploit potential correlations that might exist between the outputs. Tree ensemble methods have however been explicitely extended by several authors to the joint prediction of multiple outputs (e.g., Segal, 1992; Blockeel et al, 2000). These extensions build a single tree to predict all outputs at once. They adapt the score measure used to assess splits during the tree growth to take into account all outputs and label each tree leaf with a vector of values, one for each output.